In the story Feb. 22 story "Experts: More danger than meets eye in upcoming Supreme Court case," please replace the 20th paragraph with the following:

While the government is not arguing that the Flast expansion be overturned, Bull's friend-of-the-court brief and several others supporting the government's side of the case contend Flast should be curtailed or eliminated altogether. The traditional way to prove standing, Bull argued, would suffice to remedy establishment-clause violations through the courts.

-30-

---