New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Monday, March 15, 2010
Home arrow Opinion arrow Opinion: The future of American Christianity
 
Opinion: The future of American Christianity Print E-mail
By David Gushee   
Thursday, March 12, 2009

(ABP) -- Trinity College’s American Religious Identification Survey was released March 9. Its headline finding, as

summarized by USA Today: “Faith is shifting, drifting or vanishing outright.” The news that “almost all denominations are losing ground” is sobering indeed. It helps to clarify that recent budget cuts in Baptist life and elsewhere are not just about our current Great Economic Meltdown, but instead dovetail with a broader fade of organized American Christianity.

First, let’s consider some of the most important numbers, in case you missed them. Since 1990:

  • The percentage of Americans who self-identify as Christians has dropped by 11 percent, over half a percentage point per year.
  • The percentage who claim no religion has nearly doubled, from 8 percent to 15 percent. The “Don’t Know/Refused” group also more than doubled, from 2.3 percent to 5.2 percent.
  • Self-identified Baptists have dropped from 19.3 percent to 15.8 percent of the population.
  • Mainline Protestants have dropped from 18.7 percent of the population to only 12.9 percent; Methodists went from 8 percent to 5 percent. At that rate, the mainline will die within 40 years.
  • The percentage who identify as Wiccans or other new religious movements has increased from 0.8 percent to 1.2 percent, a small but rapidly growing number. Adherents of Eastern religions have also doubled numerically, as has the Muslim population.
  • The percentage of Catholics has dropped only slightly, from 26.2 percent to 25.1 percent.
  • Those who identify as “followers of Jesus” or some other kind of generic Christian represent 14.2 percent of the population, down a bit from 14.8 percent in 1990 but still representing 32 million people.

We are a nation still populated by a majority of self-identified Christians -- nearly 75 percent claim some relation to Christian faith. But the numbers are dropping quickly; if trends continue, Christians will constitute 64 percent of the population in 2026, and barely half in 2044. The shortfall will be made up primarily by what statisticians of religion are starting to call the “Nones,” pure secularists who claim no religious affiliation.

In terms of the culture-war battles that have wracked the nation for a generation, unless wise new leadership emerges in both the Christian and the secularist communities, vicious battles will continue over all manner of symbolic and substantive issues -- from monuments on courthouse grounds to abortion, gay rights and the use of religion in the armed forces. It also seems likely that the volleys between aggressive atheists like Richard Dawkins and those seeking to counter them will only intensify.

There will continue to be sharp regional differences, as secularist numbers spike in the West and Northeast (Vermont led the nation with a 34 percent None population) and grow more slowly in the Bible Belt. Increasingly, secularists and their children and grandchildren will have no exposure to the Bible and Christian traditions, and therefore little interest in or understanding of the residual cultural overlay of religiosity still apparent in our national life.

What does all of this mean for Christian mission and our witness in culture and politics?

I think we will witness (are already witnessing) a winnowing process in which weak, ineffective, or maladaptive churches and religious organizations are simply going to die. Congregations will close, parachurch organizations and schools will shut down, and entire denominations will fold or merge with others. Creative efforts will be required everywhere to forestall this fate.

It is likely that surviving denominations, including the Baptist bodies, will have to consolidate their operations. It is hard to imagine there being six surviving Southern Baptist Convention seminaries a generation from now, or over a dozen Cooperative Baptist Fellowship-related seminaries and divinity schools. It could be (ironically enough) a Darwinian moment, as only the strongest and most adaptive survive.

Many congregations and parachurch groups will drop denominational labels in order to ensure their greatest chance of success and not be damaged by denominational-brand baggage. This will continue to deeply challenge the ongoing significance of, for example, Baptist identity.

Christian colleges will have to decide how serious they are about their faith identification. Those that deliver excellent education in a context of robust spiritual vitality will do better than those that provide only one of the above -- or neither. The weakest of these colleges will also merge or die.

Christians who bring faith-based moral convictions into the public square will win less and less. Some will respond by just shouting more loudly, thus turning more people away from Christ. Others will shift to a paradigm of faithful witness rather than cultural victory. Broad-based coalitions across religious and ideological lines will be a necessity.

The era in which cultural Christianity delivered bodies and dollars to churches and sustained thousands of often marginally effective Christian organizations is ending. The era in which Christians could afford to spend their time and money fighting with each other in the pews or the annual conventions or the newspapers is ending.

We will either deliver to people vital, meaningful, life-changing, Christ-following Christianity, or we will die of our own irrelevance.

-30-

David Gushee is distinguished university professor of Christian ethics at Mercer University.





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (11)Add Comment
What did Jesus do?
written by Dr. J, March 12, 2009
Seems to me, Jesus brought faith based moral convictions into the public square- He was not worried about winning less and less. I learned to apply a question to many situations I face. I suspect the question is relevant to this discussion. "Do you want to win, or do you want to be right?" When it comes to faith, I hope I'm right. True faith is non-negotiable.
Picking up speed
written by Davidc, March 13, 2009
Great article and insights from Gushee. I'd add that the economic pressures of our day will likely increase the speed of the winnowing.
Didn't Gushee just say that?
written by JeffF, March 17, 2009
Dr, J, didn't Gushee just say that Christians will have to shift to faithful witness rather than cultural victory. That means you give witness to what you believe is right, regardless of winning or losing. It seems to me that you and David are saying the same thing.
A Price has to be Paid
written by southwerk, March 17, 2009
Christians are commanded by God to spread the word. For the last forty years many denominations have run essentially political organizations. Politics is easier than imitating the life of Christ. Now the price is being paid. Why should anyone consider Christianity as a vibrant philosophy relevant to their lives when their only encounters with the church was when it fighting over school curriculum, contributing money and volunteers to political campaigns, cursing leaders that disagreed with them, fighting to place religious symbols in public places and hammering the message that this is a "Christian" nation and everybody had better get in line.
southwerk
written by Ken, March 17, 2009
"Spreading the word" covers a lot of ground. Are we really obeying Christ if we keep silent about such issues as abortion and gay marriage? You seem to think the church should give people "a vibrant philosophy relevant to their lives", and yet you slam churches who get involved in relevant, practical issues. Am I the only one who sees an inconsistency here?

I don't claim to know what the future holds for American churches, but I do know this: I will never look to David Gushee or anyone else connected with CBF to find the answers. That group actually had to debate whether they would appoint homosexuals as missionaries, and they cannot agree on whether Jesus is the only way to God. At their annual meeting, they even had a speaker who openly denied the deity of Jesus. If this is your idea of a "relevant" and "vibrant" faith, no wonder the world wants no part of it.
People: Please read the article before posting.
written by JeffF, March 17, 2009
David never once suggested that Christians should be quiet about what they believe. He's simply repeating what we already have seen. The church no longer has the clout to keep issues such as lotteries, casinos, etc. from being passed into law. The church should always speak out on issues that it feels are important. I think what the author is trying to say that the church may need to change its definition of success. The church may not be able to keep the lottery from being passed in their state, but they can still give a faithful and thoughtful witness as to why this is a wrong. In no way is the author suggesting that the church should keep its mouth shut because "you're going to lose anyway." Anyone with that interpretation comes with their own agenda.

Anyone else see the irony in Ken saying he will never look to Gushee for the answers yet he obviously looked at the article? -Funny.
JeffF
written by Ken, March 18, 2009
"Anyone else see the irony in Ken saying he will never look to Gushee for the answers yet he obviously looked at the article? -Funny."

I will explain what I meant, since you don't seem to have enough common sense to figure it out for yourself. "Looking to someone for answers" is a figure of speech which means that you have confidence in someone's opinion. I read Gushee's articles, but I have ZERO confidence in his opinions or in anyone else associated with CBF.

Many of the leaders in the CBF also used to be leaders in the Southern Baptist Convention. They constantly argued that the SBC should avoid taking a stand on "divisive" political issues. Actually, they had no problem with the SBC taking a stand on issues per se; they just didn't like it when the SBC took a conservative stand on abortion and other issues.

Case in point: James Dunn. He worked on Jimmy Carter's reelection campaign in 1980. He defended this action, claiming that being a Christian does not mean being a "political eunuch" (Dunn's own words). Along about that time, Southern Baptists (and a lot of other Americans) started voting Republican. When Carter lost the election, Dunn and other liberals started calling on Christians to stay out of politics.

Consistency, thou art a jewel - and an exceedingly rare one among liberals.
Bullies for Social Action
written by southwerk, March 18, 2009
Churches can make their views known. I have no objection. But I have every objection to demonizing opponents of what they call "Christian" views. I have seen over and over again religious organizations stomping bull like into the public domain blasting intelligent discussion of issues. The purpose of Christians is to save souls for Christ. That should be the primary concern of the Church every day, every moment. Using the church to seize political power is a distraction from the healing message of Jesus Christ. We have a job to do as Christians. It's fun to play politics, to make the elected officials jump, to make a big splash in the newspaper or on television. This is a distraction from the message. Millions of Americans believe that being a Christian means a political animal who is always on the attack. The only views we fail to put forward are the core beliefs of the followers of Jesus Christ. Many churches have for all intents and purposes have sold their faith for a little political influence.
southwerk
written by Ken, March 18, 2009
I think you're being a bit melodramatic. I'd be interested in seeing some documentation for the accusations you've made.

As for what is the "Christian" position on some issues, I grant that everything in politics is not cut-and-dried. On the other hand, how can a Christian speak in defense of homosexual marriage or the killing of the unborn?

I've never "demonized" anyone who opposes school prayer or homeschooling per se, but I have been extremely critical of people who wish to outlaw them. To do so would infringe on religious liberty, which Baptists have always supported.

As for those churches who are too involved in political issues to preach the gospel, I think you'll find liberal churches are the main offenders in that area. They don't preach the gospel because they can't agree on what the gospel is.
JeffF
written by Dr. J, March 21, 2009
Hi JeffF:
I liked Gushee's final sentence. I'm afraid we are already dieing in irrelevancy. If the Gospel is going to win, then my neighbors need to see more of Christ's love in me. I think it is that simple.
...
written by theresafleming, March 21, 2009
While the numbers listed in this article are concerning, the truth is even worse. For the story these numbers don't tell is the story of all the people who claim to be Christians, but no longer believe that they must listen to the truth given to us by God in the Bible.

There is but one truth-God's truth. He had one Son-our Savior Jesus Christ. And God's truth can be found in only one place on this earth-The Holy Bible.

Jesus was never afraid to speak the truth-and neither should we be. We remember that lesson well on the mission fields of Africa, but we seem to forget that lesson quickly once we come home to the U.S.

As Christians, we must focus less on numbers and more on the truth. The Bible clearly indicates that there would come a day when many would be confused. There would be false messiahs and charismatic leaders who would spin lies so convincing that many would follow them. This should come as no surprise to us. And yet, although we were forwarned, we have not prepared. For like a dark wave spreading accross our country, daily more of God's people are loosing their faith.

America's light is dieing, because we are letting it die. And the only question that remains is, do we have the courage to fight to bring it back? And if we do, what do we do next?

We must do-as we have always done-love the people. Bring food, medicine and compassion--and truth. For the greatest mission grounds of all are right here.

As for speaking out about the great truth that the Bible teaches, this is not the time to weaken. For it is only Christ's truth that can set our world, and God's people, free. And as Christians, we must embrace it, share it and shelter ourselves in it. For we were born, "for such a time as this".

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.