New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Home arrow News arrow Hate-crimes bill divides evangelicals
 
Hate-crimes bill divides evangelicals Print E-mail
By Bob Allen   
Thursday, April 30, 2009

WASHINGTON (ABP) -- Hate-crimes legislation passed April 29 in the U.S. House of Representatives drew mixed reviews in the religious community.

The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act, H.R. 1913, which passed the Democratic-controlled House by a vote of 249 to 175, would provide federal assistance to prosecute hate crimes. It also would add sexual orientation and gender identity to current classes protected against hate crimes, including race, religion and national origin.

Many religious conservatives oppose the measure, saying it could be used to stifle free speech.

Barrett Duke, vice president for public policy and research of the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, called it "an irresponsible piece of legislation" that "puts Christians and many other religious groups in the government's crosshairs."

"While we should never condone acts of violence against anyone, for whatever reason, including whether or not that person is a homosexual, this bill proposes to prosecute someone based on their belief about homosexuality and therefore makes religious belief a germane issue in this debate," Duke said in Baptist Press. "Anyone who holds a religiously based belief about homosexuality is immediately suspect of engaging in a hate crime if a homosexual is involved, even if the person was unaware that the victim was a homosexual."

Andrea Lafferty, executive director of the Traditional Values Coalition, called it "anti-Christian" legislation that could allow a pastor's sermon against homosexuality to be prosecuted as hate speech.

The American Family Association said that since the bill doesn't define sexual orientation, it could be interpreted to protect 30 practices including incest and pedophilia.

Progressive evangelicals including Jim Wallis of Sojourners, mega-church pastor Joel Hunter and Derrick Harkins, pastor of Nineteenth Street Baptist Church in Washington, meanwhile, called the measure both moral and necessary.

David Gushee, distinguished university professor at Mercer University and a columnist for Associated Baptist Press, said he supports the bill "because its aim is to protect the dignity and basic human rights of all Americans, and especially those Americans whose perceived 'differentness' makes them vulnerable to physical attacks motivated by bias, hatred and fear."

Gushee said he believes the bill "poses no threat whatsoever to any free speech right for religious communities or their leaders" and its passage would "make for a safer and more secure environment in which we and all of our fellow Americans can live our lives."

"For me, the case for this bill is settled with these words from Jesus," Gushee said. "As you did it to one of the least of these, you did it to me."

Sens. Edward Kennedy and Patrick Leahy introduced a companion measure in the Senate April 28, titled the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, after a young gay man fatally beaten in 1998.

If the bill passes both houses of Congress, President Obama is expected to sign it. The House and Senate both passed similar legislation in 2007, but under threat of veto by President Bush failed to agree on a final version.

-30-

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it  is senior writer for Associated Baptist Press.

 





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (4)Add Comment
No threat to free speech?
written by Ken, April 30, 2009
This "hate crimes" bill sets a dangerous precedent because it punishes people for believing that homosexuality is wrong. True, its supporters claim it will only punish violent crimes, but who will be culpable for the crimes? Suppose the perpetrator is a church member, and his pastor has preached against homosexuality. Will the pastor be prosecuted as an accessory to the crime?

David Gushee says this bill poses no threat to free speech. I'll remember that when the government starts prosecuting pastors simply for preaching the Bible.
more liberal nonsense
written by Dr. J, April 30, 2009
Seems to me a violent crime against an white hetero male is a hate crime- especially if you are the he. This is simply liberal nonsensical social justice.
...
written by Jesdisciple, April 30, 2009
It wasn't long ago that Homeland Security declared us suspected of terrorism... I don't like where this is headed.
What does this bill provide?
written by Dr. Matt, May 02, 2009
Some of the people who have spoken on this bill aren't telling the truth. The bill would provide federal assistance if someone selects and commits a violent crime against another person because that person is homosexual, heterosexual, or bisexual. Believing that homosexuality is wrong and preaching against it would be perfectly legal. To this day, it is legal to preach that schools should be segregated or slavery should be legal. It just isn't commonly done, because people's values have changed.

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.