New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Home arrow News arrow Conservative ‘National Day of Prayer’ supporters upset over Obama snub
 
Conservative ‘National Day of Prayer’ supporters upset over Obama snub Print E-mail
By Robert Marus   
Thursday, May 07, 2009

WASHINGTON (ABP) -- Conservative organizers of National Day of Prayer-related events expressed disappointment that President Obama chose not to mark the day May 7 in the same elaborate fashion as his predecessor.

But some groups that support strong church-state separation applauded Obama for pulling back from the emphasis that President Bush placed on the event, which in recent years has come under fire for being dominated by conservative evangelicals. And at least one conservative Jewish leader also defended Obama’s decision.

Many Religious Right leaders have roundly criticized Obama for choosing not to observe the day with any sort of White House ceremony. “We are disappointed at the lack of emphasis on prayer on this National Day of Prayer,” said James Dobson in a Capitol Hill press conference with members of Congress to mark the event May 7.

The Focus on the Family founder’s wife, Shirley, has long been the chairperson of the privately funded National Day of Prayer Task Force, which coordinates the Capitol Hill observance of the event as well as similar ceremonies around the country. Earlier, she issued her own statement expressing dismay that Obama did not plan anything resembling the prominent prayer-day observance that Bush held in the East Room of the White House each of his eight years in office.

Rep. Randy Forbes (R-Va.), who led the press conference following a lengthy prayer service in a House office building, said organizers were disappointed that the White House didn’t even send an official representative of the executive branch to the Capitol Hill ceremony.

“I think the president missed a wonderful opportunity," he said.

Obama did, shortly after the Capitol Hill ceremony ended, issue the traditional proclamation marking the day.

“Let us remember those who came before us, and let us each give thanks for the courage and compassion shown by so many in this country and around the world,” he said.

President Obama, with faith advisor Joshua DuBois in the background, signs his official proclamation declaring the 2009 National Day of Prayer. (PHOTO/White House)
“Let us also use this day to come together in a moment of peace and goodwill. Our world grows smaller by the day, and our varied beliefs can bring us together to feed the hungry and comfort the afflicted; to make peace where there is strife; and to lift up those who have fallen on hard times. As we observe this day of prayer, we remember the one law that binds all great religions together: the Golden Rule, and its call to love one another; to understand one another; and to treat with dignity and respect those with whom we share a brief moment on this Earth.”

Presidents since Harry Truman have declared a similar day calling on Americans of faith to humble themselves, give thanks and pray for the good of the nation and the world. President Reagan standardized the observance to the first Thursday in May.

However, in the two decades since then, the event has become closely associated with Dobson’s task force. Critics have decried the group, which limits its leadership and the speakers at many of its events to conservative evangelical Christians, for its exclusivity.

In recent years, some critics have staged rival events that are more ecumenical in nature.

Online applicants to become coordinators for the task force must affirm an evangelical Christian statement of faith that upholds biblical inerrancy. They must also list the name of their local church and describe their involvement in it.

Earlier this year, two religious-liberty groups asked Obama to shun the task force’s celebration and declare a more “inclusive” National Day of Prayer.

As president, Obama has shown unprecedented sensitivity to adherents of minority faiths as well as non-believers. He acknowledged atheists in his inaugural address Jan. 20, and during an April 6 appearance in Turkey said that "one of the great strengths of the United States" is that, although “we have a very large Christian population, we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation. We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values."

While many conservative Christians lambasted Obama for his statement -- and did so again at the May 7 press conference -- other religious leaders and groups applauded him for it, as well as his decision not to observe the National Day of Prayer in the fashion of Bush.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State issued a statement thanking Obama for not re-creating Bush-style observances. Nathan Diament of the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations -- usually an ally of Religious Right leaders -- said in a May 5 blog entry that criticism of Obama’s decision “is inappropriate -- and, moreover, not in keeping with the purpose of the observance which is to unify Americans through a national moment of reflection and aspiration to higher purposes."

Joshua DuBois, the director of Obama’s White House Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, did not immediately respond May 7 to a reporter’s inquiry about Obama’s reasoning in not continuing the ceremony.

But White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs was asked about the subject in his regular May 6 press briefing. “Prayer is something that the president does every day,” he said.

One Baptist leader said that he thought the entire enterprise was “misguided.”

Brent Walker, executive director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, said in a May 5 post on the Washington Post/Newsweek “On Faith” blog, that it isn't "government's job to tell the American people what, where or when to pray.

“Although most presidents have issued prayer proclamations, two of the most ardent supporters of religious freedom, Thomas Jefferson -- author of the Virginia Bill Establishing Religious Freedom -- and James Madison -- father of the Constitution -- opposed them.”

Walker concluded: “Exhorting our country to repentance and prayer is altogether proper. Who would argue we don't need it? But it's more appropriately called for by the preachers, priests and prophets among us -- not civil magistrates, the Congress or even an American president.”

-30-

Robert Marus is managing editor and Washington Bureau Chief for Associated Baptist Press.

Related ABP stories:

Groups urge Obama to proclaim 'inclusive' day of prayer (4/23) 

Ecumenical and evangelical groups tentatively join in day of prayer (5/5/2006)

Bush salutes National Day of Prayer, but some Christians decry politicization (5/6/2004)





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (8)Add Comment
The Secularist
written by tenor1, May 07, 2009
It figures. At least HE didn't make an effort to support something he doesn't believe in. I believe HE is calls himself Christian for political expedience, but like every leader of every Marxist/socialist regime the world has known, where open practice of especially Judeo-Christian religions is either banned outright or pushed underground, HE is a secularist. HE wants that for America. Socialism or statism has no place or tolerance for anything held above the State. Otherwise, that nasty term moral absolute gets in the way. How else could HE support killing viable, infant children who survive attempted abortion? Moral relevancy takes the place of good and evil, right and wrong. It did for Stalin, Hitler, Chairman Mao, and the list goes on. These people did not know they were the embodiment of evil, but rather were doing good. Secularism flourishes wherever socialism rules. That religous void now awaits the coming tide of Islam, Sharia law, and barbarism. Give it another 20 years in Europe.
It's About Time
written by Nathan, May 08, 2009
Praise the Lord that we have a President who understands that, although “we have a very large Christian population, we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation. We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values." Jefferson and Madison had the guts to oppose a national day of prayer, back when Baptists were enough of a fringe religious minority to agree with them. Since becoming the majority Protestant group, far too many of us developed collective amnesia about what it is to live as a persecuted minority and how our ancestors were imprisoned by an oppressive state-church regime. We finally have a President who agrees with the Founding Fathers on the benefits and necessity of church-state separation - what a concept!
Nathan
written by Ken, May 09, 2009
"We finally have a President who agrees with the Founding Fathers on the benefits and necessity of church-state separation - what a concept!"

I think you need to go back and read your history. The founders believed in religious freedom, but they didn't believe that the government should be free of all religious influence. Thomas Jefferson certainly saw nothing with using government buildings for religious purposes. He used to attend Sunday services in the House of Representatives.

By the way, if the founders of this country could see how Obama is attempting to take over private businesses, they would turn over in their graves.
joyful
written by Dr. J, May 10, 2009
I suppose Gushee and all other Obama elites are very happy with Obama's diss of Christianity.
...
written by Jesdisciple, May 10, 2009
I actually agree with Obama on this one, even though saying so tastes bad. Christianity as an institution should not have direct government aid, and that's what the old holiday amounts to. (Note that I don't include the Ten Commandments or prayer in that - completely different issues.)

And I wish we didn't have so many in the conservative camp whose knee-jerk reaction is (or at least looks like) bigotry. Yeah, I'm talking about the first and fourth comments above. That kind of attitude is one of the reasons Obama got elected, I believe.
Was it Dobson's fault?
written by Slick, May 11, 2009
Jim Dobson may mean well but he's become fairly irrelevant is recent years. He loves to get in as much of the national spotlight as he can to whine about one or two social issues and attack candidates who don't agree with him and yet has the audacity to expect those same people he attacked to fall in line on one of his pet projects.

Noting against the national day of prayer--everyday ought to be such. I think oBAMa erred in not participating or at least having a rep there. But if he, as president, atends that, what should he do when the muslims want their national day. He could have attended or sent some one as a matter of personal Christian practice but did fail to do so.

Maybe he just wanted to slap dobson in the face.
not bigotry
written by Dr. J, May 11, 2009
I just think the left got what it wanted. A president who doesn't give a rip about Christianity. But was more than willing to trumpet his Christianity during the campaign. Dear Jesdisciple, I love the way you call people names who do not agree with you. It makes me wonder if your web Id 'Jesdisciple' is appropriate. I disagree with you. But I haven't called you a bigot.
Separation of Raunch and State?
written by EdJon, May 15, 2009
[It's still legal - and always God-honoring - to air messages like the following. (See Ezekiel 3:18-19.) In light of government backing of raunchy behavior (such offenders were even executed in early America!), maybe the separation we really need is the "separation of raunch and state"!]

In Luke 17 in the New Testament, Jesus said that one of the big "signs" that will happen shortly before His return to earth as Judge will be a repeat of the "days of Lot" (see Genesis 19 for details). So gays are actually helping to fulfill this same worldwide "sign" (and making the Bible even more believable!) and thus hurrying up the return of the Judge! They are accomplishing what many preachers haven't accomplished! Gays couldn't have accomplished this by just coming out of closets into bedrooms. Instead, they invented new architecture - you know, closets opening on to Main Streets where little kids would be able to watch naked men having sex with each other at festivals in places like San Francisco (where their underground saint - San Andreas - may soon get a big jolt out of what's going on over his head!). Thanks, gays, for figuring out how to bring back our resurrected Saviour even quicker!


Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.