New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Home arrow News arrow Religious leaders call for inquiry into U.S. use of torture
 
Religious leaders call for inquiry into U.S. use of torture Print E-mail
By Bob Allen   
Tuesday, June 16, 2009

WASHINGTON (ABP) -- A group of high-profile religious leaders from various faiths is pushing President Obama to establish a commission of inquiry to investigate alleged United States-sanctioned use of torture since 9/11.

Thirty-three religious leaders met with administration officials after gathering in front of the White House June 11. They presented a letter signed by 50 individuals representing Christian, Jewish, Islamic and Sikh organizations. The letter urged the president to establish an independent, non-partisan commission to "uncover the whole truth" about U.S. torture policies and practices.

One of Obama's first acts in office was an executive order banning torture in interrogation of suspected terrorists. The president has said he believes use of torture is wrong, but he opposes a special inquiry, believing it would be perceived as retribution against his predecessor that would become a distraction from his policy agenda.

The religious leaders contended that existing institutions are inadequate to guarantee the abolishment of torture, and that an independent commission would be more credible and thorough in establishing safeguards to prevent future twisting or ignoring of laws against torture.

"The reality is that our nation is now shackled to a shameful history of torture," the letter said. "As people of faith we know that only the truth can set us free."

"We must therefore, as a nation, be mature and honest enough to examine fully and disclose completely the wrong doing that has been committed," the leaders wrote. "The transparency and openness of a Commission of Inquiry will help to hold us all accountable for the policies and acts of torture carried out in our name. Accountability is essential in a nation of laws."

One of the signers of the letter, David Gushee, president of Evangelicals for Human Rights, wrote an Associated Baptist Press column in March arguing for a "Truth Commission" on the issue of torture. He said it is needed "because we need to know exactly what happened."

"It has been very difficult to have an honest public debate about exactly what our nation has done to those in our custody because we have never been given full information," Gushee, a professor of Christian ethics at Mercer University, said. "We have half-debated what has been only half-revealed. We need to bring what has been done in the shadows into the full light of day, and see how it looks when exposed to that cleansing sunlight."

From a Christian moral perspective, Gushee said, an investigation could move the nation closer to reconciliation.

"Biblically, reconciliation generally involves truth-telling, repentance and forgiveness," he wrote. "Unpacked a bit further, reconciliation includes the wrongdoer's acknowledgment of responsibility, confession of the act as sin, expression of grief for any harm done, serious commitment to a new course of action and request for forgiveness. It sometimes also involves some concrete form of recompense offered to the one harmed by the one who did the harm."

"Once our nation's acts have been exposed to the clear light of day and we see that the facts merit repentance, I dream that we would demonstrate the moral courage to acknowledge responsibility for wrong acts, confess them as sin, express real grief for the harms done, commit ourselves to a new course of action (and solidify that commitment in concrete legislation and executive policies), offer recompense to those whom we have harmed where that is appropriate and ask our victims for forgiveness," he wrote.

In their June 11 letter, faith leaders quoted from Isaiah 11:2, pledging to pray for the president to receive "the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and the fear of God."

-30-

Bob Allen is senior writer for Associated Baptist Press.





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (7)Add Comment
real torture
written by Dr. J, June 16, 2009
Maybe these so-called religious leaders should call for an inquiry into real torture in the US- the torture to death of millions of babies. Maybe they should call for an inquiry into Obama's sympathy for infanticide- murdering babies survivors of botched abortions. Maybe they should try ministry rather than politics.
...
written by Jesdisciple, June 17, 2009
Dr. J, I think your response contains about as much politics as the article's subject. I'm personally undecided on this issue, but Gushee etc. seem to believe what they say. The primary difference between you and them is opinion, not motive.

As for the topic, I think the ethical framework needs to be elaborated before we could actually do anything with the additional data. Limited utilitarianism is a fully biblical and logical position; we only need to define the limit better.
OK use of extreme methods
written by Slick, June 18, 2009
If methods used by interrogators at Guantanamo resulted in false a confession, that was wrong, just as the inquisition, the rack, etc. were wrong. Most people will say what someone wants to hear given enough pressure or pain. If those same methods resulted in obtaining information about our adversaries in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other places, that that is absolutely okay. That is information that may keep more of our troops alive and help us achieve victory over the enemies of freedom and liberty.

And J, your one-issue babble contributes mothing to this thread.
false confessions?
written by tenor1, June 18, 2009
"If methods used by interrogators at Guantanamo resulted in false a confession........." I can't believe that some of you people just don't get it! What "confessions"? There was nothing to be confessed, for cryin' out loud. This was not like turning a thumbscrew until some poor sap cried "I did it!" whether he did or not. The simple fact is that there were THREE bad guys who we knew had information critical to saving thousands of innocent lives. That information came hard, but it came; and the threats were verified and substantiated. The plots were interrupted and lives were saved. Not to mention other land marks in New York and elsewhere. I'll trade some discomfort to those THREE Muslim terrorists, who were ready to blow themselves up in a heartbeat if they could accomplish their objectives, for thousands of innocent Americans any day.
Hey dimwit...
written by Slick, June 19, 2009
You supported my position. We got information...not confessions. So-called confessions obtained through the use of extreme methods cannot be reliable but when information about enemy activitiy is obtained and then is proven reliable, the ends justified the means. Keep on using waterboarding to get information.
response to tenor1
written by Dr. J, June 25, 2009
I'm with you. I bought a t-shirt last week. It says, "I'd rather be waterboarding'.
Exactly what is unethical about torture?
written by Xenophon, August 06, 2009
I have never heard in any of these articles on torture exactly what the philosophical or theological rationale is for categorically opposing torture.

One rationale for torture in some cases is utilitarianism as Slick mentioned. Another is the social contract theory, which I subscribe to. I would oppose the utilitarian justification because utilitarians consider only the total number of lives saved and do not consider the matter of guilt and innocence in their calculation.

But I am not clear why anyone would oppose torture in any and every case.

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.