New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Home arrow News arrow Judge clears National Baptist Convention presidential vote
 
Judge clears National Baptist Convention presidential vote Print E-mail
By Bob Allen   
Wednesday, September 09, 2009

WASHINGTON (ABP) -- A judge in Washington ruled Sept. 9 that the election of a new president of the nation's largest black Baptist convention could go forward as scheduled on Sept. 10.

One of two candidates vying for the post, Henry Lyons, a former president of the National Baptist Convention USA, Inc., who resigned from the post 10 years ago after being convicted of swindling more than $5.2 million from organization partners, filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the election on Sept. 8.

Lyons, pastor of New Salem Missionary Baptist Church in Tampa, Fla., claimed a 2006 bylaw amendment limiting the number of votes that a representative entity can cast unfairly favors his opponent, Alabama pastor Julius Scruggs. Scruggs is currently the convention's vice president at large.

The Associated Press reported Sept. 9 that District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Jeanette Clark denied two motions by Lyons that would have blocked the election, which takes place on Thursday of each year's annual session with results announced that evening.

The contest is taking center stage at the convention's Sept. 7-11 annual session in Memphis, Tenn. Both men vying for the office, which carries a salary of $100,000 a year for a five-year term, are 67 years old.

Supporters of Lyons, who served nearly five years in prison after his conviction on state racketeering and grand-theft charges and pleading guilty to federal tax-evasion charges in 1999, say he is a changed man who has paid his debt to society.

Supporters of Scruggs, meanwhile, say that even if Lyons is sorry for his past, it would be a mistake to put him back in charge after a huge scandal that severely tarnished the convention's reputation. 

Lyons, a charismatic preacher elected as president in 1994 on promises that he would help alleviate the convention's financial woes, remains a polarizing figure. Opponents fear his election could split the NBC, which claims 7.5 million members and is America's largest and oldest African-American religious convention.

Lyons' successor in the office, William Shaw, pastor of White Rock Baptist Church in Philadelphia, has worked to restore confidence in the organization. He has helped institute new guidelines for conducting convention business that became known as the VISA Principles -- an acronym for "Vision, Integrity, Structure and Accountability."

Shaw, elected president in 1999, has served two five-year terms and is ineligible for a third. He was a featured speaker at the New Baptist Covenant Celebration in Atlanta in 2008. He has received many awards, including the T. B. Maston Foundation Christian Ethics Award from the T.B. Maston Scholarship Foundation.

Lyons was a powerful voice in Baptist life before his downfall, which began in 1997 when his wife burned down a $700,000 home he, along with another woman, co-owned. Lyons and his wife later divorced.

The arson case brought attention to a lavish lifestyle that investigators said Lyons bankrolled with funds obtained through his leadership role in the NBC.

In February 1998 Lyons was arrested on state charges that included racketeering and grand theft. He was convicted a year later, and then resigned the next month as president of the convention.

Lyons then pleaded guilty to federal charges, and served concurrent prison sentences for both crimes. He served four years and eight months of a 5 1/2-year prison sentence before his release in December 2003.

After completing five years of probation in 2008, Lyons filed papers to regain his former office. Before that, he ran unsuccessfully for president of the Florida General Baptist Convention in 2007, winning about 30 percent of the vote.

Lyons' supporters responded by embarking on a 30-day period of prayer before deciding to establish a new convention. The General Baptist State Convention of Florida, Inc., was established May 25, 2007, and Lyons was elected its first president.

The National Baptist Convention traces its history to 1880. Before that, some independent black churches belonged to white associations in the South, but attempts to form all-black churches into associations or conventions were not allowed.

A missionary named William Colley, an African American appointed to serve in West Africa by the Foreign Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention in 1875, issued a call for black Baptists to meet in Montgomery, Ala., for the purpose of organizing a national convention to do extensive missionary work.

Along with foreign missions, home missions and education, one of the early goals was for black Baptists to publish literature written by their own ministers. The American Baptist Publishing House refused in 1890 to publish writings of black ministers because of resistance from Southern clients. The National Baptist Publication Board came into existence in 1896 and opened a publishing house in Nashville, Tenn.

The convention suffered its first major schism in 1897, when the Lott Carey Foreign Mission Convention broke away over differences about mission strategy and working more closely with whites.

A dispute over ownership and operation of the National Baptist Publishing House prompted a second split in 1915, with formation of the National Baptist Convention of America.

During the Civil Rights Movement, younger ministers including Martin Luther King Jr., pushed the National Baptist Convention to take a more proactive position for social justice. The older generation preferred the more gradual approach to civil-rights advances. That prompted a third major split, formation of the Progressive National Baptist Convention, in 1961.

In recent years the National Baptist Convention USA, Inc.; National Baptist Convention of America, Inc.; Progressive National Baptist Convention, Inc.; and National Missionary Baptist Convention of America have held joint midwinter meetings to promote greater cooperation among black Baptists, but no formal merger is anticipated.

During the last two years those groups have also reconnected with white Baptists through participation in the New Baptist Covenant, a movement started by former President Jimmy Carter to unite all North American Baptists around common concerns including justice and concern for the poor.

-30-

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it  is senior writer for Associated Baptist Press.

 





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (5)Add Comment
...
written by tj282828, September 10, 2009
Is anyone else spooked by the fact that a judge is giving permission for a Baptist convention to hold elections? By giving permission, the judge is saying I have the authority to say you can't hold elections. Where is Barry Lynn and the other separation of church and state ABPers when you really need them. Oh, notice how the article expresses no outrage that a judge would presume to tell a Baptist body if it can hold an election.
Contract Law Not Constitutional Law
written by Big Daddy Weave, September 10, 2009
The suit claimed breach of contract....

The National Baptist Convention USA like all 501(c)(3) organizations are not immune from state/federal law. Ultimately, the judge determined that this suit was without merit and thus the election can go on...

There is no church-state issue here.

And the purpose of news articles is not to express outrage or agreement. That's the job of op-eds and editorials.
...
written by Slick, September 11, 2009
Once again Aaron is correct in his assessment while others are so narrow they can't see the forest for the trees.
...
written by tj282828, September 11, 2009
Yes, I agree. ABP, just like the NYTs, never puts perspective or opinion in their news stories. Big Daddy, do you really believe what you just said? Are you so blinded by your own bias that you can't see ABP has a left wing bias? I'm sure you can see that BP has a right wing bias! Open your eyes, neutral media does not exist.

Your comments about law prove my point. The law, as currently constituted, gives a judge the right to forbid a Baptist organization from holding an election. You do agree that the judge could have ruled for the plaintive? Such law allows the state to insert itself in the church. This power can be abused. The BJC should be concerned, but they only care about keeping church out of state, not state out of church.

Slick, do you actually have a point to make or are you just going to take pop shots at me? Instead of just calling me names like "narrow," why don't you make a point worth listening to? I could say you are a liberal lunatic, but that doesn't move the conversation forward does it? Debate coaches rightly say that name calling is a sure sign one is losing a debate. Why? Because if people have a logical point to make, they make it. If one can only call names, he might as well be nice and wave the white flag.
Debate???
written by Glenn, September 14, 2009
I must ask the previous poster where the debate is. Postings here are for reader comment and opinion and the previous poster obviously has his. Your so-called point seems misguided, in my opinion, because the post by Big Daddy Weave seemed to clarify the difference between the state meddling in doctrine and state involvement in assuring adherence to the organization’s constitution. If an organization has constituted rules and the organization has tangible assets, following those rules is important and courts can and have intervened. Again, my opinion and not a debate.

I also notice some sensitivity to a comment made by another poster. That sensitivity seems strange to me in that the writer did not mention your name at all.

Finally, the previous poster accuses Big Daddy weave of having a liberal bias. That accusation is true based on the writings BDW has posted here but that is not to say a liberal bias is bad or wrong. Previous poster appears to have a conservative bias but neither is that bad or wrong—just different.

One observation I continue to make, based on multiple comments posted on line and elsewhere is that the very fundamental conservatives want to attack any position however slightly more to the left than theirs as wrong. Not different, but wrong. I may not agree with liberal positions, and I rarely do, but to say that those positions are wrong or unsupported by scripture is a position I cannot adopt. I am very much a conservative Baptist and it’s not my job to judge other Christians who may be more liberal than I. That’s between them and God. And my conservatism is between me an God.

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.