New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Home arrow News arrow Ban on religious signs at football games roils Georgia community
 
Ban on religious signs at football games roils Georgia community Print E-mail
By Bob Allen   
Monday, October 05, 2009

FORT OGLETHORPE, Ga. (ABP) -- The woman who sparked a controversy over signs bearing Bible verses at a north Georgia high school's football games says she was not offended by the signs and was surprised when the district superintendent banned them.

Catoosa County Public Schools ruled Sept. 28 that the practice of football players at Lakeview-Fort Oglethorpe High School bursting onto the field through paper banners bearing motivational Bible verses opened the district to lawsuits and must be stopped.

At the Oct. 2 home varsity football game, the team took the field through a banner reading "This is Big Red Country." Players marched across the field and dropped to one knee in a circle of prayer.

Though banned from the playing field, religious messages filled the stands. Students wrote Scripture verses on their chests with body paint, wore T-shirts printed with "Warriors for Christ" and held banners like "You took him off our sign but you can't take him out of our hearts."

The school board's decision that the religious banners violated the Constitution's ban on establishment of religion has galvanized the 900-member student body and community. Hundreds protested the ban in a rally at a public park Sept. 30.

Fueling the outrage was the report that the tradition started shortly after the 9/11 attacks had to end because of a single complaint.

"It's just bizarre that we live at a time where a single complaint from one hypersensitive person can trample the right to free speech for an entire community," Tim Wildmon of the American Family Association said in a statement. "When the Bible gets banned in Fort Oglethorpe, Georgia, you know that religious liberty is in big trouble in America."

The outcry prompted the alleged complainant -- Donna Jackson of nearby Ringgold, Ga. -- to come forward with her side of the story.

"I actually was the one that called the Catoosa county school system," she said on Ringgold's WAAK 94.7 FM Thursday night. "I was wanting to ensure that a federal law was not being broken by our school system who works very hard at what they do."

Jackson issued a press release admitting that she made a call to Catoosa County school superintendent Denia Reese about cheerleader signs but denying that she was complaining about them or threatening to sue.

She said she took a class last summer at Liberty University, where she is studying toward a doctorate in education, on school law, and it prompted her concern that the cheerleader signs be done in a way to avoid a federal lawsuit.

"I never used the word 'complain,' 'complaint,' 'grievance' or any other word similar in meaning," Jackson explained. "I expressed concern that teachers could be subject to lawsuits or losing their jobs. My concern was a direct result of the class I took this summer" at the conservative Baptist school.

Jackson said she "neither intended nor expected" the superintendent to "take the drastic action that ensued." The school district responded by releasing a memo documenting a Sept. 23 phone conversation where Jackson reportedly informed the superintendent she was breaking the law and it needed to stop.

After the telephone conversation, Superintendent Reese said Jackson filed an open-records request for financial documentation for purchase of supplies to make the banners. The school system sought legal advice, she said, which confirmed the cheerleaders' use of the banners would likely constitute a violation of the First Amendment as currently interpreted by the Supreme Court.

In her initial statement, Reese said she reads the Bible daily and regrets the cheerleaders cannot display their signs in the football stadium without violating the First Amendment. She said students could still display the signs in a designated area outside the stadium.

Charles Haynes, senior scholar at the Freedom Forum's First Amendment Center, said there is no "bright legal line" between what courts see as voluntary prayer by students and a public school endorsing a religion.

"The cheerleaders were carrying out their duties as the school's cheerleaders by holding the banners as part of their cheerleading," Haynes said. "So I think a court would likely rule that they are sending a message of school endorsement of a religious message by putting up signs with scriptural quotes at a school-sponsored event."

Though support for the cheerleaders has been overwhelming, it is not unanimous. The Chattanooga Times-Free Press interviewed two students at Friday's game standing out in the sea of supporters wearing hand-lettered shirts that said "Protect the Law."

"I just want people to know there are other beliefs," senior Steven Harris told the newspaper. "This isn't a Christian school."

Opposition to the district policy transcended even team rivalry. Across the field from the Lakeview-Fort Oglethorpe bench, the visiting Ridgeland Panthers from Rossville, Ga., draped signs on a fence reading "We support your team" and "We believe."

Unfortunately for the Warriors, that support didn't translate to the Panthers giving up touchdowns. Ridgeland won the game 34-0.

-30-

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it  is senior writer for Associated Baptist Press.

Previous story:

Cheerleaders' Bible banners raise community controversy (9/30)

 





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (10)Add Comment
My religion is not an enemy of the state
written by scottmillerco, October 05, 2009
How did we let a group of liberal activists turn the first sixteen words of the Bill of Rights into a method for suppressing religion and free speech? They took sixteen very explicit words and made them mean that public employees have to conceal their faith and that students cannot publicly express themselves. How did we get here?
legal strategy and need for discernment
written by Xenophon, October 05, 2009
This fear of lawsuits nonsense needs to be countered in the same way that the same ploy in affirmative action cases was countered, and that is by suing when government representatives who favor the Left out of fear of being sued act to infringe on our freedoms. In this case, the school board should be sued for demanding that the signs be removed. Lawyers representing the cheerleaders could claim that such bans are infringements on free speech. In so doing, the school boards or whoever cannot avoid the substance of the controversy by claiming that they are merely avoiding a costly lawsuit since they will get sued anyway if they cave in to the Left without a fight.

Liberty University also needs to teach their law students some common sense. I do not think it is any accident that such a school would instill a rigid frame of mind in its students. This woman who drew attention to the sign and raised the controversy does not seem have any judgement or realistic understanding of how the world works nowadays. We must be "wise as serpents," not goody-two shoes looking to enforce mindlessly idiotic rules imposed by our opponents who have gained power of the judiciary in past decades.
...
written by BaptDude, October 06, 2009
Sorry folks...doing something like this does infringe upon rights of OTHER PEOPLE that are protected by the 1st Amendment. Everyone is whining and complaining about the rights of these kids, but what about the rights of the religious minority students at that school? They exist, as they do everywhere, and they are probably so frightened by all of this that they hope no one finds out they aren't white, middle class Protestants.

From a non-legal perspective: these kids can do other things to spread Christianity outside of writing scripture on banners or calling themselves Christ Warriors. I guarantee there is a local Boys and Girls club in that area, and what better way to spread the love of Christ than teaching a child to read? Or playing kickball? Or doing something that no one else may have ever done for them, which is love them unconditionally. All of these kids claim to love Jesus so much, but I would bet a HUGE sum of money that a portion of these kids washed off their body paint and smoked some pot or took off their football and cheerleader uniform and had unprotected sex. Christianity is a faith to be lived out, not written on banners.
symbols and cymbals
written by bapticushereticus, October 06, 2009
scottmillerco: ... public employees have to conceal their faith and that students cannot publicly express themselves....

bapticus hereticus: the inability to use scripture at a football game means one must conceal faith and that such means it is no longer possible to publicly demonstrate it, either? perhaps said faith is a bit fragile and irrelevant?
question for BaptDude
written by Xenophon, October 06, 2009
BaptDude, would you please explain how holding up a sign with a Bible verse at a football game, if paid for by private funds, which I assume it was, violates the rights of anyone?
...
written by wilx1, October 06, 2009
The Constitution prohibits the "Federal" government from establishing an official National religion. It says nothing about the States except that they cannot infringe upon someone's right to practice what they believe. The Constitution does not protect people from hearing or seeing things they don't want to see or hear. The last time I looked the local schools were not owned or operated by the Federal government.
The abuse of scripture offends me.
written by Arce, October 07, 2009
By virtue of the post-civil war amendments and Supreme Court precedents, the first amendment religion clauses have been extended to the states and to the agencies of the state, which includes all political subdivisions of the states, such as cities and school districts. Official action, or actions which have the color of official action, that promote one religion over another or over irreligion are considered contrary to the First Amendment, as a result.

It is a freedom of conscience amendment and, as interpreted by the SCt, bars the use of state facilities, authorities, powers, etc., to advance any religion over any other or none. The cheerleaders are an official school entity, at an official school function, on school property, displaying scripture. That the school officials voluntarily changed this practice when the conflict was called to their attention speaks to their wisdom in avoiding a greater and more costly conflict.

As a life-long Baptist, I am offended by the misuse of Christian scripture by placing it on a cheerleader banner (even at a non-public school). I am further offended by such at a public school event. However, students in a club that is not school-sponsored could hold up a sign at a football game without offending the first amendment, provided it was not part of the official event. However, it always offends me, because I believe it demeans the scripture, as do the ugiquitous "John 3:16" signs that have meaning only to one familiar with the Bible, and not to the vast majority of those who are not Christians already.

The commenter is a life-long Baptist and an attorney.
no violation of rights
written by Xenophon, October 07, 2009
I have noticed that Baptdude ( I see that he has posted on this cite today) or anyone else who has had the opportunity to comment on my question above has not. I would like someone who has taken a leftist, French Enlightenment view of the separation of church and state to explain very clearly how this banner violates anyone's rights. I do not believe that you can.

As for the more recent interpretations of the Constitution, I and others believe those are decisions were wrongly made. In fact, in the recent Supreme Court cases such as the Ten Commandments being posted in government buildings, the Court upheld the constitutionality of their posting at the Texas state capitol. The constitutional law on these matters is in flux as Antonin Scalia has pointed out.

http://www.hamodia.com/inthepaper.cfm?ArticleID=370

I do believe that if we keep pushing on these kinds of cases that the Supreme Court with the addition of Justice Alito will provide a clear majority to overturn or, in effect, gut the notorious Lemon test that has been alluded to in comments above.
Rise up Christian soldiers. Take up your cross.
written by dmr2701, October 15, 2009
There is no clearer case of religious oppression than this. For those who've thought it wrong for school officials to participate in promoting Christianity, where do you stand now? This is clearly the choice of the cheerleaders to make these Bible banners. It's called freedom of the press and freedom of speech and/or the free exercise of religion.

In fact, our founding fathers never intended to suppress religious expression in our schools. It was the main reason we had public schools, to promote the Christian religion and its morals among our young people. Find and read Noah Webster's "Advice to the Young" which was once part of a school text book. It includes his moral catechism and open promotion of Christianity as the only truth. Read George Washington's Farewell Address which was also a textbook until the Supreme Court suppression of religion began in 1949. Therein you'll find our first Commander-in-chief promoting Christianity and condemning all who would attempt to separate religion from morality.

Please find and read "Original Intent" by David Barton to discover what the founders truly meant by the first amendment and how horribly modern Supreme Courts have willfully and wickedly subverted the original intent of our founders and thrown this nation into disarray.

It is inexplicable for Christians to continue to lie down against tyranny and to shame the name of Christ by their cowardice. "Dare to be a Daniel. Dare to stand alone. Dare to have a purpose firm and dare to stand alone." taken from the song.
...
written by kash, October 15, 2009
Really? Is this what it has come to? Do we in the US have such soft comfy lives that we think persecution equals not being allowed to let football players crash through a banner with a Bible verse instead of a school motto? I've always joked that football was more of a religion than Christianity in the south; sadly, it appears its no joke.

How is free speech denied when every person in the stands if they so desire can stencil "Jesus loves me but he can't stand the ACLU" across their chests as long as they are officially representing the school or asking an entire non-religious school group to do so also? Do you honestly think that if there is an agnostic or Muslim or Hindu football player they are going to feel comfortable asking to be exempted from praying on the field or bursting through a Bible verse? Can you honestly not see how this sets up a situation where the school is condoning one specific religion? And for goodness sakes, what about when Jesus tells us to pray in private, instead of on football fields like the hypocrites do?

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.