New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Home arrow Opinion arrow Opinion: Prosecuting missionaries good for Haiti, families, church
 
Opinion: Prosecuting missionaries good for Haiti, families, church Print E-mail
By Fritz Gutwein   
Friday, February 05, 2010

(ABP) -- The arrest and jailing in Haiti of 10 Southern Baptists on charges of kidnapping and criminal association is appropriate and consistent with gospel values.

While I do not like to see anyone suffer, I fully support the Haitian government in its prosecution of the Americans who thought they were doing God’s work when they sought to, in their own words, “gather 100 orphans from the streets” in their bus and take them to the Dominican Republic.

Haiti is in crisis from a devastating earthquake like no other in our lifetime. 200,000 people have likely died. And 10,000 non-governmental organizations, all with good intentions, are descending on Haiti in an attempt to ease suffering. The better NGOs work with the Haitian people and what is left of the Haitian government.

The Southern Baptists from Idaho appear to have worked solely with a single Haitian-American pastor and ignored advice that what they were doing was wrong, illegal and that they would likely be detained when they attempted to cross the border with these passport-less, non-orphaned children.

That they would go from orphanage to orphanage and then door to door looking for children to take to the Dominican Republic and then hopefully to good Christian homes in the United States is an exploitation of the suffering and desperation of the Haitian children, their parents and prospective adoptive parents.

The people and government of Haiti need our help. But they don’t need American Christians coming to their country to take away their children.

All people cherish family. For years, my wife and I worked with Kentucky Baptist Homes for Children as therapeutic foster parents. We went through countless hours of training, sat through many in-home visits from qualified social workers and were overjoyed to share our lives with children in crisis. Our first priority was the care and safety of the child. The second was reunification with their birth family.

Breaking up a family is serious business. Removing a child from its culture is serious business. Children always dream of going home. And yet, sometimes what is best is for children to be placed elsewhere. But it is impossible for that to be determined without a good deal of investigation and reflection -- and that certainly can’t happen in a quick trip across two countries by people not trained in social work or running an orphanage. This should be done by well-trained professionals and not inexperienced, well-intentioned people on their first trip to Haiti.

Accelerating the adoption process for children already in the system who have been matched with families is one thing. Combing the streets to find children to remove from any home or homeland is another -- and, frankly, is quite appalling. Would it have been God’s will for missionaries to have descended on New Orleans after Katrina to rescue children by taking them to Canada with the hope of being adopted in France?

The prosecution of these well-intentioned, but misguided and unrepentant Baptists is good for the church.

The lawyer for the Idaho 10 has called them victims -- victims of the Haitians who duped them into thinking they had the correct paperwork. He is both right and wrong. They were duped by the peculiar strain of American evangelicalism that seems to think the United States is God’s chosen country and that seeks conversions by any and all means, including adoption.

This strain of American evangelicalism has duped many churchgoers into thinking the lifestyle enjoyed by middle-class Americans is the ideal. If someone, or some country, has a lifestyle that is not up to our economic standards, they are somehow in need of our lifestyle and our culture.

This has been taken to the extreme by theologians and pastors who encourage infertile couples to have the family of their dreams and expand the Kingdom at the same time by adopting a child from another culture and heritage and replacing that heritage and faith with their own.

It should not be surprising that well-intentioned, God-fearing Baptists of such congregations would then respond to a tragedy such as the Haiti earthquake by flying to the Dominican Republic one day, driving a bus to Haiti the next and attempting to return with children that will both fulfill their dreams and expand the rolls of those who will enter the kingdom of their God.

This doctrine of salvation is false. It is good for the church that it is exposed for the heresy it is by this prosecution.

It is my hope that those of us who want so desperately to help our Haitian brothers and sisters will respond to this crisis with swift aid and thoughtful attention to the dreams and plans of the Haitian people themselves. I hope we will be able to work alongside them to help them refine those dreams for a new future on the island they call home. That is good for Haiti, good for families and good for the church.

-30-

Fritz Gutwein is a Baptist minister, a therapeutic foster and adoptive parent as well as co-director of the Quixote Center and coordinator of their Haiti Reborn program.

EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER: As part of our mission to provide credible and compelling information about matters of faith, Associated Baptist Press actively seeks a diversity of viewpoints in its columns, commentaries and other opinion-based content. Opinions expressed in these articles are not intended to represent ABP editorial policy and do not necessarily reflect the views of ABP’s staff, board of directors or supporters.

 





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (34)Add Comment
...
written by misa, February 05, 2010
I disagree with you. I think they were naive. I wish Ronald Reagan were President. He would call the Haitian PM and tell him that he is sending a C 5 plane and that he wants those Americans on it right away or else he will send the military to come get them. He would tell them the plane can be full of food or empty and that it is up to the Haitian government how they wish to play it. Instead we have a complicit US government who is just fine with over-taxing the American people while the Haitian government, instead of helping house its citizens, is "housing" 10 naive Americans, against their will. Clearly the Haitian government is saying it does not trust the US to try its own citizens. They should send them back. Even the French are fed up. My husband is a US French dual who has stopped being a Democrat over this nonsense. We have hikers held in Iran, we have a US soldier held by the Taliban since June and now this.
...
written by Lori A, February 05, 2010
Sorry Misa I have to agree with the OP. These people were warned, told straight up that what they were about to do was not acceptable and that it would most likely have consequences if followed through on. I'm personally tired of hearing all the hoopla about Christians doing God's work when it comes to "rescuing" children. Tell me these children weren't going to other countries with a hefty price tag on their heads, and I will tell you that its a lie. Help and helping yourself are two different things.

Thanks Frits for posting this article. Its truly a God send to know that not all religious affiliates think ripping children from their families is acceptable.
I totally AGREE with this article.
written by ElaineP, February 05, 2010
Finally someone is shining a light on what goes on in some foreign adoptions. For too long people have been adopting foreign babies for tens of thousands of dollars and don't have a clue what really goes on. This group had been turned down by a few orphanages in Haiti, got frustrated, so started handing out flyers with lies on them to coerce the parent(s) to let their children go. The lies are one on top of the other. I hope that this really puts a HUGE spotlight on the corruption that really goes on in foreign adoption.
...
written by KT2005, February 05, 2010
So let me see if I understand this right. Haiti and her government are in shambles. Children are dying daily for lack of care. Someone has a bright idea to move some children to a new orphanage in the stable country next door. So far this sounds like a great idea.

The missionaries think they have proper documents from the government saying they can take the children across the border, but as things turn out they do not have the proper documents. The government is not even functioning due to the disaster. So the thought of gaining the proper documents when half the government is literally dead is a pipe dream. So the missionaries take the limited documents they do have and try to do best by the children. Once again, the missionaries believe they have enough documentation to move the children. They may not have normal documentation, but what is normal in Haiti after the earth quake has killed so many.

To sum things up, the missionaries believe they are acting legally. Genius above would have the missionaries wait on the proper stamp from a half dead government in chaos before helping children in danger of literally dying. Could the author have painted these missionaries in any worse light?

This paragraph by Fritz is just ignorant:

"The Southern Baptists from Idaho appear to have worked solely with a single Haitian-American pastor and ignored advice that what they were doing was wrong, illegal and that they would likely be detained when they attempted to cross the border with these passport-less, non-orphaned children."

The missionaries had documents but not the right documents. They believe they are acting legally! He should know this. "ignored advice"? From who? When? Did he just make this up? "Non-orphaned" children? Yes, but the families gave them to the missionaries in hopes of providing the children with food, shelter, education, and a better life. If they have the family's permission what is the problem? (Yes, the families were told they could visit.) He paints the missionaries as liars who are taking "non-orphaned" children away. . . as if by stealing! The family said ok, take our child. The author does not even mention this IMPORTANT fact. This is irresponsible journalism at its worst, and ABP should pull the article.

I have never seen this level of hatred in the Baptist wars. Would his level of venom be just as poisonous if these were not Southern Baptists? The man does not even give all of the facts. How is this not libel?

Not real sure what to make about the international adoption rant toward the end. Evidently Christians are satanic when they want to adopt children from impoverished countries. How dare they desire to provide food, shelter, and, yes, even the Gospel to their new son or daughter. What planet is this guy from?


It's the legality of the matter, not theology
written by Nathan Barnes, February 05, 2010
I agree that these folks should be prosecuted, but not because of their theology. What drove them to do this was a kind of thoughtless madness, perhaps well-intentioned, but nevertheless destructive and illegal.

They would have done much better just giving their money to the Red Cross.
...
written by misa, February 05, 2010
The Haitian Prime Minister said he is open to having the ten Southern Baptists tried in the US, but no US government official has contacted him. He said he needs to hear from them. On the other hand, we are willing, in the US, to try Islamic terrorists on US soil. I still think this is religious persecution against them because they are Southern Baptist.
...
written by misa, February 05, 2010
Giving money the Red Cross is giving money to the CEO. Has anyone Googled Charity Navigator to see what Gail earns? You would be impressed.
...
written by LKSeat, February 05, 2010
I basically agree with what Fritz wrote, but I object to the use of the word "missionaries" used in the headline. As one who served as a career missionary for thirty-eight years, I am not pleased that these U.S. Christians who just went to Haiti for this short time are considered missionaries.
...
written by Lori A, February 05, 2010
KT2005 Maybe you missed this part.
http://cnn.com/video/?/video/world/2010/02/04/ac.penhaul.americans.charged.cnn

I have no problem with people helping, but these people were told, they knew, and they went anyway. They were shopping and looking to make serious money off these kids suffering. Help means rebuild, reunite, not remove permanently. You want them air lifted out fine, document them and bring them back. That is not what was going on here. They made promises they couldn't keep, they represented themselves as an existing non profit organization, they don't even have a web site yet. Does this mean they needed to sell a few kids first before they could move out of a hotel room and into their permanent building, set up the web site, and apply for their non profit paperwork. I respectfully disagree that this organization had plans of doing anything other than to supply a demand and they got caught.
...
written by KT2005, February 05, 2010
Lori,

This video is poorly done by CNN. The guy lists 4 lies.

1. Their main goal was to help orphans, but does this mean they would not ever help a poor family that could not care for a child? No. . . this is not a lie.

2. The group was not a registered non-profit. Of coarse they were not. They were in the process of forming when the earthquake happened and in light of the disaster hurried up their ministry time line in order to help hurting kids.

3. The Dominican Republic said they did not have the proper Haitian paper work. Other people in Haiti said they did have the proper paper work. The missionaries believed their Haitian advice over the Dominican Republic. The DR would have accepted the children if they had crossed the border.

4. They said families could follow the progress of the children on a web site. How is this untrue. Just because it had not been made yet does not mean it was not going to be made as soon as they entered the DR.

CNN says four lies. . . yet they prove none of it. Lori, if you believe these missionaries were in it for the money please offer evidence. A simple hunch does not count. These poor people are caught up in a firestorm of Haitian parents looking for their lost dead children. There is a fear people might have stolen their child for money or organs. Now this fear is being hung around the neck of these missionaries.

Once again, where is the proof of wrongdoing?

Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?. . . Do they even believe that in Haiti?
...
written by ElaineP, February 05, 2010
I thought this group also did these "trips" in Ecuador and Russia... Let Haiti try them -- whatever country you're in, you have to abide by their laws... How arrogant to think otherwise.
...
written by Lori A, February 05, 2010
Thank You ElaineP for the article. If you read it you will find that this woman has had past indiscretions, some with the most basic of laws, like registering her vehicle and obtaining insurance for it. Her house was forclosed on and wasn't she named in several law suits? Okay the proof isn't concrete against her yet, but by her own acts she does not look like a person who respects laws or authority. I feel for the 18 year old who was most likely fed too much adoption and God's will kool aid. I'm sure somewhere down the line proof will come. And no I don't think that if someone here where I live were to walk up to me on the street and try to hand over their child, I would think it was okay for them to do so, or for me to accept just because they say they were the childs parent. I would think it was illegal. Are Haiti's laws so different? Again, you want to help? get over there and help, but do it in a way that helps these people get back on their feet and reunited. Just a side note, these missionaries weren't looking for the children they tried to take, they were looking for children who had no one around to protect them. How would you feel if you lost track of a child in such a disaster? Would you want someone to swoop in and leave you wondering for the rest of your life where your child disappeared to? Besides, can you prove that they're intentions were honorable? What about the children you sweep off to better homes? Do you expect them to not think about or want to go find their parents? (and in this case I will use the term "real" parents)What gives people the right to think this is acceptable? Other than past performance all around the world. So far you're two for two. Each item, including the original post, is shotty and poorly done according to you. Can you produce better in their defense? If God wasn't attached to this scenario would you still think it ok? What if it were Big burly types with past criminal histories? Would you still feel their efforts were in the name of God? If this was God's mission for them, then they are EXACTLY where God wants them to be.
...
written by brianswim, February 05, 2010
Fritz- This is why I left the baptist denomination "cult"! You guys throw your friends under the bus if it will make you look good in the public poll. One of those being held in Haiti is a good friend of mine. He's about as much into trafficking as you know what your talking about. You don't have all the facts sir. Why is it not being mentioned that it wasn't until they told the Haitian police that they wouldn't pay a bribe they were arrested. Haiti breaks my heart, but it was in shambles before the quake and now even worse since. Why are they not spending this time and energy chasing the thousands of prisoners who were locked up for murder, rape, ect.?
What is it that you mean the doctrine of salvation is false?
...
written by ElaineP, February 06, 2010
I'm an adoptee involved in the adoption community and know the horrors of children being coerced away from their parents. It's horrifying and wrong. Most kids would rather live with their parent(s), even if they struggle and are in poverty, than be placed in a palace with strangers. A college education and a swimming pool do NOT replace natural parents. These 10 Americans - according to their own website - had hotel rooms for adoptive parents who could wait for their little adoptlings... very disturbing... at $10,000 minimum donation per each little head, it would've gotten the leader out of some bad financial issues she's having... she is actually broker and more in debt than the people she coerced the kids from... appalling... disturbing...
http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=125&article=67740
...
written by Lori A, February 06, 2010
Brianswim
Your friend may not have been into trafficking, but it is still his responsibility to fully understand the mission. Not paying the bribe was not their first mistake, but it certainly didn't help, and if they had paid the bribe then it would have been trafficking. Kind of a catch 22 don't ya think. Taking children out of countries on your own is never a good plan. One of this groups members knew exactly what she was doing and personally I think some one in that group should have investigated her before crossing borders with her. Maybe they wouldn't have went.
Quick to Condemn
written by Bobby McCord, February 06, 2010
Seems to me the writer has already condemned these folks when it is clear from his article the only thing he knows about them is that they were evil Southern Baptists. If these people were stealing babies for profit, I agree that they should be prosecuted. I don't know exactly what they were doing with what authority and neither does the writer of this outragiously hate filled article. If these folks had come from a liberal leaning baptist church with a woman pastor, this same writer would be singing their praises and demanding their release. By the way, if this slow unorganized response by our government to feed and shelter these who are suffering in great tragedy, had been done by a conservative president, he would be called racist and uncaring. My how the liberal press has changed its tune since Katrina. Its amazing at the double standard you liberals have. Now it is ok for children to go hungry and thirsty, and die from injuries because of Government red tape, now its ok for all the food and water to stockpile at the airport due to government stupidity while people die of starvation on the other side of the city. Now it is ok for people like this writer to condemn someone when he doesn't even know what is going on simply because they are conservative Southern Baptists. Extreme Hypocrisy!!!
Amen, Bobby!
written by Mark Osgatharp, February 06, 2010
Bobby,

While I do not condone anything the people did - even if they did only what they themselves said they did - you are right on with the hypocrisy of the Baptist left and the news media. They take every opportunity they can to smear anything they can remotely associate with Bible believing Baptist people.

By the way, just take a look at Mr. Gutwein's Quixote Center web-site. Obviously, on "trained" people like Mr. Gutwein are capable of helping orphans. Can't have anyone intruding on their turf. LOL!

Really, brother McCord, I think if you will do some serious and open minded study of the matter, you will find that the whole organized "charity" and "missions" and "education" system operated by the religious denominations of this world is shot through and through with hypocrisy, greed and graft - and always has been. The only way to clean up the dirty little baby is to toss it out with the bathwater and then stomp it to death. That isn't likely to happen before the Lord returns, but until such a time, real Christian people and churches out to get just as far away from the whole sordid mess as they possibly can.

Mark Osgatharp
Wynne, Arkansas
...
written by pjerwin, February 06, 2010
All these words and none of you really knows what happened.
Words & knowing
written by mcskinny, February 07, 2010
PJ may be correct. We expound opinions and only think we know what happened by what we read or heard from a number of sources. Just as telling (and living) how God has actually done and is doing in our personal lives is a more effective approach to witnessing. Quoting scripture or great theologians comes in second. But, we are challenged to be discerning.

What I have read and heard leads me to believe that this was an operation planned and attempted with personal gain in mind. Should this be true, in Luke 17:1-4 Jesus had a warning for those who lead others to commit wrongs. Paul also warned that those in leadership roles who lead followers astray would be judged harshly.
Charlie Mac
...
written by 0asspress, February 07, 2010
I disagree with this article.

I agree that Christians should know the laws of any country in which they are seeking to minister, and if they fail to abide by those laws, they should be face the law, just as anybody.

I am not confident that this author or any of the people commenting know exactly what went on here. The authorities should be involved (with U.S. presence and lawyers for all sides). None of us should be basing an opinion on what CNN or some other news organization reports. The facts may be more complicated than we know.

I agree with the article and some of the commenters in the basic assertion that Christians in the U.S. often have wrong and undeveloped or immature concepts of what "missions" is or how Christianity in the U.S. is not the ultimate expression of the true faith.

However, I do not take joy in what has happened and do not believe that prosecution somehow advances the Gospel.

These people from the U.S. should not be merely seen as pawns to prove some larger point about the Gospel, as the author may understand it, or as tools to show that what some Christians in the U.S. is warped by materialism or a belief that life in the U.S. is the best thing on this earth.

One senses the author of this article is overcome with a sense of glee that these yahoos from the U.S. are going to be taught a lesson, and thus, all conservative Christians in the U.S. are going to learn a lesson about how superior they think they are in the third world... That sentiment runs through the article, with little care for the legal rights or the knowledge or state of mind of the people from the U.S. Some of the commenters are even more direct.

Isn't that attitude just the flip side of the attitude that the "missionaries" are supposed to hold? They see, we are told, the children and their families as pawns for the fulfillment of their misguided evangelical purposes.

The author and his supportive commenters are just as bad. These hapless Americans are just pawns or examples to be hammered so that all the U.S. and the Christians here will learn a lesson.

People, whether the Haitian children or their families, or the missionaries from the U.S. are people. We should want the best for them. They are not just illustrations in the flesh for someone's ideological point.

We should hope that the true facts will be discovered. That the children will be put where they belong and need to be. And that the people who violated the law will be corrected, gently if it turns out to have been simply misguided compassion.

We should not take joy in any of this, but only in a just, fair and compassionate conclusion.

Let's leave the ideological point scoring out of this episode.
Discouraging
written by Luke, February 08, 2010
It is discouraging to me to find this editorial on the ABP news site. The Baptist church from Idaho is being charged with very serious crimes. The author seems to be quite flippant and pompous. I am a moderate...and yet increasingly find myself dissapointed with the moderate baptist voice that seems too often to be concerned with pointing out the flaws of the evangelical movement. It definitely has flaws....and yet I feel great kinship to my brothers and sisters in Christ. I wish I found such kinship promoted by our moderate baptist voice.
Excellent points
written by d28bob, February 08, 2010
I believe that Fritz raises some important topics and don't believe that he is just slamming people of any faith. I ask readers to mentally change the term "Baptist" in the whole story with "Catholic" or even "Muslim" and see how your opinion would change?

The laws of the US are no different regarding moving children overseas without parental consent. It's illegal to do it without proper paperwork. PERIOD! Just ask anyone who has tried to take minor children overseas - it is a defense against human trafficking and noncustodial parental kidnapping to evade jurisdiction.

I am particularly glad to see the Baptist press questioning the ethics of overseas adoptions and conversion. Feeding the hungry, caring for the sick, the poor, widows and orphans are Gospel commandments - NOT taking children out of the only home they have ever known with the assumption that suburban life is better for them.

American religious missionaries of all denominations have been guilty of stamping out Native American culture in the name of Jesus by taking children from their tribes, just as missionaries once justified the exploitation of Africans as slaves by giving them the Cross as a substitute for their pagan freedom. It's time to lay down the "White Man's Burden" and simply feed His sheep regardless of their beliefs.

After all, even Jesus was a Semitic Jew, not a Caucasian Christian....
The Truth
written by Bobby McCord, February 09, 2010
The truth has now come out that the reason the 10 missionaries were arrested was they did not have the $50,000 to bribe those officials who are now detaining them. Haiti is a thug country with a thug government. Their children are starving, hurting, and dying. Their violent criminals have escaped and are raping, stealing, and killing across the country. With all of this the Thug Leaders of Haiti want to prosecute 10 Americans who were trying to save lives. America should pull out all aid, food, people and money until the 10 are released. This is another case of of our American Leadership giving away money we don't have to people who hate us. One phone call from Obama could release these people.
...
written by pjerwin, February 09, 2010
d2Bob You're right: missionaries have got to stop proselytizing. Christians -- especially Baptists -- are arrogant to think that they have something pagan people need. After all, pagan ways -- especially the most primitive of them -- are much purer than ours. When Jesus told Peter to feed His sheep, he was just telling Peter to meet people's physical needs with regard physical hunger, so all they need from us is to give them food. Or better yet, since Jesus was talking to Peter, not the other disciples and certainly not us, we need to stay out of there altogether and let nature take its course. We need to stay at home and take care of the sheep in our own communities. But then again, who do we think we are interfering in the lives of even our next-door neighbors? First of all, why do we think they should be Christians -- worse yet, Baptists -- and place on them yet one more burden. Just because the Bible suggests that everyone has sinned and deserves death and Hell doesn't give us the right to make people feel guilty. Maybe they don't come from Christian -- or Baptist -- families; they need to be allowed to maintain their own family cultures without our interference. Perhaps we should just take care of the sheep in our own households and leave it at that. Or maybe Jesus was really telling Peter to take care of some animals Jesus had acquired. If we're taking that passage as applying to us, perhaps we need to be taking care of animals -- well, not all animals, just sheep.
Was it really kidnapping?
written by jmjohn, February 09, 2010
Hello all,

To throw in my two cents here, the pictures of swimming pools used to attract the youngsters as well as the complete inability to ascertain whether the children were actually orphans or merely separated from their parents in the disaster.

I want to draw attention to this question:

"Would it have been God’s will for missionaries to have descended on New Orleans after Katrina to rescue children by taking them to Canada with the hope of being adopted in France? "

If you were in an earthquake, and a well-meaning band of Catholics came down and found your child confused in the streets, and bore him or her to Canada, how would you feel? Might you have wanted those people to instead work with the American authorities to feed and house your child in-country, and, if you were dead, find your relatives, rather than forcing you or your relatives, already impoverished and grief-stricken, on a cross-country trek to find your child to bring him or her home?

Haitians love their children, too.
...
written by pjerwin, February 09, 2010
Bobby McCord "The truth has now come out..." Can you give a link this information?
...
written by pjerwin, February 09, 2010
jmjohn You still don't know what really happened.
...
written by robber, February 09, 2010
The fact that you "fully support the Haitian government" shows your foolishness. I don't know what happened and neither do you. But I don't run my mouth off and unfortunately, you do.
...
written by Broadman, February 10, 2010
I never cease to be amazed at the pure leftist swill that I find when I visit the quaint little "newsite" known as ABP. But hats off to their consistency.
A new Day
written by Bobby McCord, February 11, 2010
Yesterday a Haitian judge ruled that the missionaries had no criminal intent and they are scheduled to be freed today. I know that dissappoints alot of you Liberals who were hoping those wicked Southern Baptist Conservatives would be hung for their crimes. The only place where government is as corrupt as Haiti is probably Chicago, oh, I forgot, they are all in Washington now. I Thank God for their release and I pray that no more good people will suffer for trying to help Haiti.
Bobby McCord
written by brotherroy, February 11, 2010
I will speak as a "liberal." I am happy that these Southern Baptists are being released, pending final resolution of the charges against them. Your belief that "liberal baptists" would somehow rejoice at these Baptist being incarcerated in Haiti reveals your own bias and anger at those Baptists with whom you disagree. With regard to your other comments, they are partisan in the worst sort of way, and reflect the low state to which civil discourse and disagreement have sunk in our country. Maybe it was a lame attempt at humor.

With regard to your earlier post above, your suggestion that we should pull out all our aid in the face of this disaster is just about the most un-Christian and mean-spirited statement I have heard in a long time.
assumption
written by Bobby McCord, February 12, 2010
My assumptions come from this article which we are commenting on. The only thing the writer knew about the missionaries was that they were Southern Baptists. It reminds me when Obama said he didn't know the facts but was sure the police acted stupidly. My assumptions about the attitude of Liberals are confirmed in articles and comments on this web site daily.
...
written by Annie Mouse, February 15, 2010
Mr. Fritz Gutwein,

Thank you for providing the voice of reason here. It's embarrassing to read that so many Christians want the 10 missionaries released without any investigation into what Laura Silsby and Jorge Puello were really up to.

We should all be ashamed. Who to we worship, our God of Truth or a human institution? How can we blithely claim the missionaries are blameless because they're "one of us"?

We should be supportive of the prisoners during this crisis, but we shouldn't demand justice be negated to cater to our collective institutional pride.

God's Will is going to be done in His time. Let's be patient.

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.