New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Friday, September 03, 2010
Home arrow Opinion arrow Opinion: For principled and practical immigration reform -- now
 
Opinion: For principled and practical immigration reform -- now Print E-mail
By David Gushee   
Monday, March 01, 2010

(ABP) -- A coalition of law-enforcement, labor, policy, religious and other groups is gearing up for a major push for comprehensive immigration reform this spring. Serious behind-the-scenes efforts are underway to secure broad and bipartisan sponsorship for new immigration-reform legislation, which has been introduced in the House but not yet in the Senate. A massive rally is planned on the National Mall in Washington for March 21.

It has been three years since the last serious push for immigration reform failed, unexpectedly, in Congress. Some may think that, with the apparent gridlock in Washington, this is not an auspicious time to push anything as significant as immigration reform. I would instead argue that this is a solvable problem and one on which bipartisan cooperation is already happening. Bipartisan success on this issue could be translated into good will mobilized for other issues.

Current approaches to immigration reform begin with the recognition that our current system is broken. At least 12 million illegal immigrants are already here. Their presence signals that our borders are still not secure, which is frightening and totally unacceptable. We have to know who is in our country and where they are.

The availability of a massive underground labor pool has a distorting effect on the economy. Employers that choose to exploit this labor market gain an unfair competitive advantage over other employers who play by the rules. Hungry immigrants needing work will obviously have to take whatever is offered them, leading to their own exploitation and the unfair disadvantaging of American workers who cannot compete in such a market.

Moving millions of workers out of the shadows and into the light would end this black-market economy. It would restore fairness to this part of the labor market and would also increase tax revenues. To the extent that these immigrant workers would gain health insurance, it would also reduce the financial pressure on hospitals and emergency rooms that now provide unreimbursed care in emergency situations. It would also lead to currently illegal immigrants paying for other social services that they now receive at the expense of legal taxpayers.

Immigration-law enforcement officials face an impossible situation. They do not have adequate budgets to even begin to try to find, investigate, incarcerate and deport large numbers of illegal immigrants. And when they do raid homes and businesses they end up being responsible for dividing families and depriving them of their breadwinners. It just doesn’t seem like America when children wait fearfully at home for fathers and mothers who have been locked up during the day and are heading for deportation.

Some voices call for just shipping all the illegal immigrants back where they came from. This is inconceivable and impossible. Consider this fact: Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin forcibly deported over six million people during his reign of terror. Deportation advocates are asking the United States government to find and deport twice as many. Any serious effort to do this would be outrageously expensive, a public-relations disaster, and a serious violation of our values.

If Stalinesque deportations are not an option, and doing nothing is not an option, we really have no choice but to undertake some kind of immigration reform along the lines being considered in Congress. It would invite those hiding uneasily in the shadows of America to come out and register their presence. Criminal background checks would weed out those whose behavior demonstrates that they should not stay here. Legalization would include some kind of requirement not just of paying taxes going forward, but also a requirement to pay extra taxes for a period of five years or so to help recompense the nation for their time here.

Greater realism related to the challenge of integrating millions of non-English-speaking immigrants has also taken hold. Current proposals are looking seriously at requiring those seeking naturalization to demonstrate some kind of English-language proficiency before they are granted citizenship. Surely one of the contributions that the churches should make in such a situation will be to offer our massive resources for free English-language instruction.

Border security also must be addressed. Resolving the status of  the millions of illegal immigrants already here must be undertaken in tandem with enhanced border security at every point -- our northern and southern borders; our ports; and, of course, our airplanes.

Notice that this approach to immigration reform is both principled and practical. It reflects both our national interests and our national values, and ought to be able to gain Christian support.  Let’s pass immigration reform this year.

-30-

David Gushee is distinguished university professor of Christian ethics at Mercer University.

EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER: As part of our mission to provide credible and compelling information about matters of faith, Associated Baptist Press actively seeks a diversity of viewpoints in its columns, commentaries and other opinion-based content. Opinions expressed in these articles are not intended to represent ABP editorial policy and do not necessarily reflect the views of ABP’s staff, board of directors or supporters.

 





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (21)Add Comment
1924 Immigration Act is what we need to return to
written by Xenophon, March 01, 2010
Ethnic/racial diversity leads to social isolation and fragmentation. Adding millions more to the mix who do not share a common ethnic/racial, cultural, and linguistic heritage will only exacerbate the trouble that we are already in. The immigration reform that we need is a return to the 1924 Immigration Act that revitalized the original character of our country.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/bowling-with-others-10936?search=1
...
written by mgoodson, March 01, 2010
Thanks for a thoughtful analysis . . . and for reminding people of faith of our obligation to push past the polarization to help forge just solutions to a difficult problem with multiple facets.
...
written by mgoodson, March 01, 2010
Xenophon is probably correct that ethnic/racial/cultural diversity is not the comfortable "me and mine" status that humans seem to prefer. Yet, Jesus (and the New Testament church) seemed to come down pretty solidly on the side of embracing that diversity with acceptance and love. Unfortunately, the church does not seem to have always followed that example. Perhaps our task as people of faith is to sort out how to match our public policy perspectives to the teachings of our faith.
...
written by Delaware Bob, March 01, 2010
"Some voices call for just shipping all the illegal immigrants back where they came from. This is inconceivable and impossible."

Remember 'Operation Wetback"?

Illegal aliens are destroying this Country, David. WAKE UP!
God ordained distinctives
written by Xenophon, March 02, 2010
In reply to mgoodson's remarks above concerning Jesus' love for all people, we can certainly respect and show compassion for all people while preserving the special qualities that God created us with that draw us to form social unions with particular people here on earth.

Jesus came to save all people. We should reach out with the Gospel to anyone whom God has placed in our path, but the concern that we have for any human in need of a Savior as well as earthly needs does not entail that we should abolish those unique bonds that we have with those with whom we create and share our own distinctive way of life as we appreciate and respect the ways of life of the various peoples throughout the earth.
Stalin?
written by Marcello, March 02, 2010
I was in complete agreement with you until you mentioned Stalin! Stalin wasn't deporting illegal residents of the Soviet Union. He was deporting legal residents whose families had lived and worked in their part of the world for generations. Needless to say, many of them were "deported" to forced labor camps and uranium mines. I certainly don't agree with those who wish to deport all 12 million illegal immigrants, but to call their position "Stalinesque" amounts to dramatic hyperbole. It damages your argument and trivializes the victims of Stalin's atrocities. Please, David, control yourself next time!
...
written by Estoban, March 02, 2010
Were Presidents Hoover, Truman and Eisenhower Stalinesque in their mass deportations of millions of illegal aliens? Were these deportations part of a reign of terror or were they to provide more jobs for hurting unemployed Americans in the depression and for our troops returning home? We now have 15 million unemployed Americans looking for any job to feed and shelter their families and 18% of our children living in poverty. About 1% of American children may go without food all day! Is this acceptable? Where is the compassion for the millions upon millions of Americans that have been gravely harmed economically, societally and even physically by a mass invasion and occupation of our homeland by scofflaws that disregard our culture, laws and people?
...
written by DavidNichols, March 02, 2010
Narrow Minded People are ruining our Country, we need to remember the Principles that built this Great Nation.

Fact: Our Government is Deporting the Parents of "legal" Citizens!
Many that have been here for generations, and up to nearly thirty years!

Fact: The U.S. Census Bureau Counted them all along to base the size of our Government Services on!
Which now must be Reduced to match the new numbers!

Fact: The U.S. Border Patrol prior to 2001, maintained water stations in the U.S. Desert to help these Immigrants get here!

Fact: These Immigrants are "Humans", and deserve to be treated as such!

Fact: True American Principles are FAR BETTER than what has happened to them since January 2008!
Co-incidentally the Start of the "Worst Recession in U.S. History!

To: Liberty
...
written by singer2, March 02, 2010
Illegal aliens are not enemies. Most of them are hard-working people trying to find work to support their families, many of whom are patiently working through the steps to get a green card or citizenship. The laxity of our borders has let them follow job opportunities, and the laziness of American workers has placed them in those jobs. Several years ago I watched a group of Hispanic workers roof my 2200-sqft home in a single day. I saw them come down only once, for a very brief lunch. I have encountered their families at a park where we used to take our grandchildren. They are loving, family-oriented people. There are criminals among them, of course, as there are among American communities. When you look at a Hispanic, however, you are likely seeing a hard-working, family-oriented person, and, in some cases, a Catholic believer. Like it or not, they are in our country to support families, and we created the situation that brought them here. Now we must fix the problem, but fix it in a way consistent with Christ's teaching to witness and care for others, and with respect for their culture, their gifts, and their energy. I think Christ said something about loving them as well. That being said, should our Christian response to the issue not be different from the angry defensiveness being shown toward them by many Americans?
...
written by John Bunyan, March 02, 2010
Your interpretation of history makes me wonder how you you got a doctorate. Critical thinking is a skill that you do not possess.
...
written by singer2, March 02, 2010
JB: Perhaps you could simply state how you disagree, rather than hurling unsupported charges. Now, go play nice.
...
written by John Bunyan, March 02, 2010
Singer2: Here are some unsupported charges from your own keyboard:
the laziness of American workers; we created the situation that brought them here; the angry defensiveness being shown toward them by many Americans. I suppose that I do not have a right to an opinion in your world but whatever fantasies you write must be true simply because you write them.
...
written by singer2, March 02, 2010
JB: You are correct. Those thoughts are my own opinions. They are generalizations, and they could be wrong. My focus, however, was upon the people that find themselves in our country, people loved by the Lord, and people to whom the church could minister. I drew my conclusion about 'angry defensiveness' from my observations:i.e., the tone of public demonstrations against immigrants in various parts of our country. My opinions are mine, as are yours. We need to talk about how Christ would have us respond.
Paul Cuadros; A Home on the Field
written by Hebrews 11:13, March 02, 2010
Hope all of yall will search more information and Read this book.

I applaud Gushee for fighting the good fight on this matter, but from my experiences in the most ethnically diverse burg in the state of Alabama, where there are a lot of good folks lighting candles in the darkness, to mobilize them in some sensible fashion to get politicians to do something honorable in this matter; I doubt it is going to happen.
Looks like 50 years after the Civil Rights struggle, real politiks would be further along; but to me it seems not to be the case.
Following scripture
written by thismakessense, March 02, 2010
Thank you for an excellent reminder of our biblical principles. You can slice and dice and search for hermeneutic escape hatches all you want, but in the end, Jesus captured the biblical sense of our relationship to the immigrant the best: "I was a stranger and you welcomed me." Address, I would remind myself and others, not to the individual, but to the nations.
straw man
written by Xenophon, March 02, 2010
The discussion of massive deportations of illegal immigrants is a straw man that attempts to make Dr. Gushee's multi-cultural (or monoculture if one goes the integrationist route) approach the only "game in town" in dealing with immigration.

Another approach to this problem that Dr. Gushee does not touch on that would likely be very effective is to require instant background checks of employees as they are hired to verify that they are American citizens or are in the U.S. legally. If the jobs dry up, most illegal immigrants will return home. Those who are detained by police for criminal behavior or defrauding the social welfare system should be deported on an individual basis.
...
written by DavidNichols, March 02, 2010
To all saying "No Amnesty", and ignoring Family units with "Legal Citizen children, to you I say God Bless America, we certainly need it now, in our Darkest Hour.

To: America, The Greatest Country on Earth.
...
written by DavidNichols, March 02, 2010
You Brilliant Commenting "Spin Doctors " play Religon any way you want, I know what Jesus would do!

C.T.R.
We need immigration reform
written by restorefairness, March 03, 2010
It's urgent to understand that fixing the broken immigration system is important both for the economy and for the security of this country. We need workable solutions that unite us together - and reform that respects due process and fairness allows us to celebrate the values that we hold dear - fairness, opportunity and due process. When we deny due process to some people, ultimately it will affect all of us. To hear more stories about why we need reform and to take action go to www.restorefairness.org.
...
written by robber, March 08, 2010
1. Gridlock in Washington is a good thing.
2. Your Stalin reference is way out of line.
3. If someone breaks into my house and expects me to feed them, I'm not going to embrace them, I'm going to call the police. That's not immoral, it's common sense.
4. If we just welcome all those who have come illegally, what does that do and say to those who have made the effort to follow the rules and immigrate legally? How would that be moral?
5. If you stopped the welfare state, the problem would take care of itself.
...
written by sanmike, March 16, 2010
It is up to the buyer to forex signal system either come up with the difference, or to buy the house for below market value. This is completely download movie site feasible in the times we find ourselves in

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.