New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Home arrow Opinion arrow Opinion: Passion for Great Commission great -- when amiable
 
Opinion: Passion for Great Commission great -- when amiable Print E-mail
By Norman Jameson   
Thursday, March 11, 2010

Norman Jameson
(ABP) -- I'm a passionate guy. Not only do I understand when a person's commitment to his or her ministry prompts a passion that excludes consideration that another ministry might be just as valid, I often applaud it. Every ministry needs advocates willing to stand on a hill and wave the banner for it or that ministry will suffer the ignominious fate that befalls the lukewarm and anonymous.

Freed from the shackles of propriety by the announcement of his impending retirement, Jerry Rankin, president of the Southern Baptist Convention International Mission Board, is unleashing his passion to wave the banner for the IMB to a degree that threatens to carry his passion to a new -- and harmful -- level.

An early advocate and silent partner in the Great Commission Resurgence movement that is examining the historic processes of Southern Baptists in ministry, education, benevolence and missions, Rankin is becoming the vocal leader for those who believe the only worthy investment of any cooperative missions dollar is outside of the United States.

There are plenty of churches in America, these advocates say, to evangelize the lost population here -- if they would just commit to the Great Commission, Jesus' marching orders at the end of Matthew to take the gospel to "all nations."

Consequently the mission dollars Baptist churches contribute through the Cooperative Program should be invested much more heavily in pushing back lostness where there is little or no Christian witness, they say.

Who can argue against that? Well, there is a case to be made both from a historical and a future context for continued investment in certain levels of Baptist processes, but more on that later.

For now, Rankin's legitimate passion for international missions has prompted him to cross the line of propriety in his criticism of Morris Chapman, president of the SBC Executive Committee. In a blog published this week Rankin questioned Chapman's commitment to the Great Commission and unloaded his frustration of 17 years of jumping through the budget request hoops in Chapman's committee without getting any significant increase for international missions.

Rankin, as does any passionate proponent, believes the resources of the Southern Baptist Convention should be harnessed and focused for the entity he leads because its assignment should be the convention's singular purpose. That passion led him to write that Chapman believes "the purpose of our denomination is not the Great Commission but cooperation."

Rankin implied that persons employed in Baptist denominational ministry who have reservations about recommendations of the Great Commission Resurgence Task Force are simply afraid "to lose entitlements."

"Apparently it doesn't matter whether we impact a lost world or accomplish anything else as long as we cooperate together," Rankin wrote. "In fact, it was said that the formula for Cooperative Program allocations must not change. I now understand why for 17 years I and my staff have been meeting with the budget workgroup of the Executive Committee, presenting our required report on funding needs, but nothing is ever done. It is just a meaningless exercise of denominational bureaucracy."

Actually, when I was on the Executive Committee staff 1977-82 I had a similar impression. Every entity head made an impassioned plea for more funds and allocations remained the same. Of course, any increase for one entity could only come from a decrease to another and every entity had a passionate banner waver who believed his ministry was the most important. I admired the presenters and was ready to give each of them an increase -- until I heard the next presenter.

Rankin called the 1 percentage point increase that the Great Commission Resurgence Task Force is recommending for IMB -- to be taken from the Executive Committee budget --- a "token." Remember, that is not a "1 percent increase" but 1 percentage point of the CP total, which equals $2 million, or nearly one third of the Executive Committee budget.

Rankin's rancor was prompted by remarks Chapman made to assembled Baptist state convention executives Feb. 10 that Rankin interpreted to mean Chapman valued cooperation above the Great Commission and that cooperation was the purpose of the Southern Baptist Convention. 

Chapman said in a statement quoted by Baptist Press: "I am saddened that Jerry so blatantly misrepresented my comments. The men who heard me speak know what I said, what I think of Christ and His commands, and where I think cooperation falls in any list of priorities. I would never say that cooperation is the purpose of our convention. It is only a means to an end -- to assist Southern Baptists in working together for the common purpose of furthering the Kingdom of God."

Chapman said he hopes Rankin "will retract his unjustified remarks. They do not befit a man of his position and stature."

Passion is a great thing; nothing moves forward without it. But as passionate Christian men and women earnestly examine the issues that threaten to apply such a "shock to the system" that the system itself could fail, let us conduct ourselves amiably, frankly and lovingly.

-30-

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it  is editor of the Biblical Recorder, news journal of the Baptist State Convention of North Carolina.

EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER: As part of our mission to provide credible and compelling information about matters of faith, Associated Baptist Press actively seeks a diversity of viewpoints in its columns, commentaries and other opinion-based content. Opinions expressed in these articles are not intended to represent ABP editorial policy and do not necessarily reflect the views of ABP's staff, board of directors or supporters.





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (7)Add Comment
...
written by KT2005, March 11, 2010
Pride is a killer of Godly things. . . and pride can indeed be the killer of CP. Pride is saying that me and my group know what is right and other orthodox people guided by the Holy Spirit have nothing to offer. I know my liberal friends will say aha! Yet the foundational argument of fundamentalism is strong. Certain concepts of Christianity are so clear in Scripture that to deny them is to deny the faith. I supported the Conservative Resurgence because liberal, lost men were running our convention. This was a war between the lost and saved over the institutions build by orthodox Christians. Now the SBC is in a new place. All leaders are orthodox and saved, therefore brothers. How I am disheartened that war tactics of the past are now used against brothers. This is not how family is to operate. Both Chapman and Rankin are saved men who are indwelt with the Holy Spirit. If they would both pray together the Spirit would give unity. It is pride that keeps these men from praying together. . . and pride goes before the fall.
...
written by Norman, March 11, 2010
The conservative movement was "a war between the lost and the saved"? You are scary.
...
written by singer2, March 11, 2010
KT: Norman is right, you don't need to go there. This could easily be turned around, and I could say you are lost because you don't agree with me. I don't know where you got your information on the CR, but I was around then. I saw fine leaders, passionate about the gospel, get accused of "liberalism" by crowds of fundamentalists who wanted power at any price. I saw nothing Christian about how the fundamentalists took over. You have every right to disagree with those who lost their jobs, but you can accuse them of being lost?
...
written by javadave61, March 11, 2010
The politicization of the convention thrives on a left/right divide. That's how the beast of power politics is fed and satisfied. And at the core is the need for false choices.

Let's see... we've seen...
  Evangelism VS social justice.
  Church planting VS compassion ministries.
  Thoughtful examination VS the fundamentals of the faith.

And now... Cooperation VS Great Commission.
...
written by KT2005, March 11, 2010
Good point Java. . . false choices are not good.

To clarify the above let me say this. There is no doubt a muddy middle where people have not thought out issues to their logical conclusion. Leaders usually have thought things out, or should have. I wrote the above on the heels of the article about a BGCT church affirming homosexuality. This same church has many members in BGCT leadership positions. I do not believe saved people do affirm homosexuality. Perhaps a baby Christian might be fooled for a bit, but the Holy Spirit will make it right. Consistent adoption of heresy shows a lack of guidance by the Holy Spirit, which demonstrates absence. No Holy Spirit means no salvation. Let us not forget the unforgivable sin: blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. There is such a thing as heretics, and heretics are not Christians by definition.
...
written by John Bunyan, March 12, 2010
"As part of our mission to provide credible and compelling information about matters of faith, Associated Baptist Press actively seeks a diversity of viewpoints in its columns, commentaries and other opinion-based content. Opinions expressed in these articles are not intended to represent ABP editorial policy and do not necessarily reflect the views of ABP's staff, board of directors or supporters."
Unless, of course, it involves any criticism of the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship and there we hear the sounds of silence. Horatio Caine: "They never learn."
SBC missions conflict
written by whoa, March 12, 2010
It has taken far longer than I predicted when the takeover of the SBC was launched in 1979, but we are there. Egos on trips inevitably collide, as is apparent in the leadership of what remains of the SBC. When will these people acknowledge that every measurable indication of accomplishment is down since the exorcised those of us who refused to allow them to tell us which adjectives we had to use to describe the Bible? When will they allow access to information about their excessive salaries and inordinate power? When will they explain why they cannot list sexual predators among church staff because of the autonomy of the local church, but they can dictate the gender of those who can serve the local church and remain in fellowship with the convention? When will they confess to the fact that the once prestigious institution known as the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary is now a Calvinist indoctrination Bible college. In response to Paul's quoted question in Romans 11, "Who has known the mind of God, and who has been his counselor..." they wave their hands while shouting, "I do, I do!!" I am proud to all myself a "revovering" Southern Baptist.


Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.