New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Monday, September 06, 2010
Home arrow News arrow Alliance of Baptists supports 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' repeal
 
Alliance of Baptists supports 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' repeal Print E-mail
By Bob Allen   
Thursday, June 03, 2010

DURHAM, N.C. (ABP) -- A progressive Baptist group that endorses military chaplains is supporting repeal of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy that bans gays from serving openly in the military.

Chris Copeland

While a number of conservative Christian groups have argued lifting the ban would infringe on the religious liberty of chaplains who believe homosexuality is immoral, Chris Copeland of the Alliance of Baptists said it would "benefit our current and future chaplains who desire to minister without prejudice to all military personnel."

Copeland, the Alliance's minister for leadership formation and chaplain endorser, wrote a letter to the Pentagon's Comprehensive Review Working Group, which is studying the impact repeal of the policy would have on the military's readiness. In the letter, Copeland expressed the group's support for a proposal before Congress to repeal the 1993 law that created the policy, which was a compromise between those supporting full inclusion and outright exclusion of gays in the military.

In May, 41 retired military chaplains signed a letter from the conservative Alliance Defense Fund to President Obama and Secretary of Defense William Gates warning that repeal would discourage military chaplains from preaching and teaching Bible passages about homosexuality. If openly gay service were legalized in the military, they reckoned, chaplains might feel pressured to water down the teachings of denominations that view homosexual practice as sinful.

Those signers included retired Army Col. Brandon Keith Travis, a chaplain for more than 28 years who since 2006 has served as team leader for chaplaincy at the Southern Baptist Convention's North American Mission Board, the denomination's official chaplain-endorsing body. NAMB's chaplaincy commission endorsed the ADF statement and distributed it to military chaplains April 28.

Richard Land, head of the SBC Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, said overturning the policy "would strain our forces, weaken troop morale and propel countless chaplains to leave the services." Land urged the Senate to filibuster a provision approved by the House May 27 that would do away with "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

Copeland, however, said repealing DADT would "encourage honesty among service members who choose to serve voluntarily but who do not want to lie about their sexual orientation."

"Most chaplains endorsed by the Alliance of Baptists would welcome this change in policy and see it as an opportunity to minister more fully and effectively with all military personnel be they heterosexual or homosexual," Copeland wrote. "They would be grateful to provide pastoral care and counseling to all military members and their families. To offer worship ministry that is ecumenical, interfaith, and fully inclusive would be seen as a 'holy' honor alongside one's military duty."

As a denomination that welcomes and affirms persons of all sexual orientations, Copeland added: "If DADT is repealed, lesbian and gay chaplains who are called to military service would have the option of being endorsed by the Alliance of Baptists and serving their denomination and country with distinction."

The Alliance was established in 1987 by moderates and liberals who, after eight years of losing presidential elections at the Southern Baptist Convention, decided to give up the fight and form an organization to preserve historic Baptist principles like religious freedom, local-church freedom and academic freedom in theological education. The group began endorsing chaplains in 1998. Today 168 Alliance-endorsed chaplains and pastoral counselors serve in various ministry areas including health care, prison and law enforcement and military chaplaincy.

Since the larger and more centrist Cooperative Baptist Fellowship formed out of the SBC holy war in 1991, the Alliance has diminished in size and shifted toward what one historian described as a "genealogy of dissent," embracing controversial stances like full acceptance of gays in civil society and the church, ecumenical cooperation and interfaith dialogue.

The Senate Armed Services Committee voted 16-12 May 28 to repeal DADT, but the Pentagon wanted to give the Comprehensive Review Working Group more time to complete its review of implementation of lifting the ban. Lawmakers agreed to a compromise that would allow Congress to repeal the policy in the next few weeks, but would delay its implementation until after Dec. 1, when the Pentagon review is due to be completed.

Observers say the repeal could face a tough road in the Senate. But it is likely to be debated this summer so the issue will be settled before the elections this November.

-30-

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it  is senior writer for Associated Baptist Press.





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (6)Add Comment
Wow
written by rusjen, June 03, 2010
I'm not a fundamentalist by any means. I don't align myself with their way of thinking or doing. However, as of late, I have been siding with them more and much less with the "moderate" Baptist groups that seems to be wading out much deeper than being open minded. This troubles me. I feel that there is not a group that can actually represent me and that I feel comfortable being a part of.
...
written by illinoispastor, June 03, 2010
rusjen, I agree. I've remained SBC instead of migrating to some other Baptist group because it's my "home". It stands closest to my thoughts, but I'm no fundamentalist. When SBC leaders speak, I often cringe. But I'm not quite as moderate as other groups. I've always said there has to be some third way; something for those who are more liberal than fundamentalists, yet more conservative than moderates. Let's you and me start something new, because we all know the world could use one more Baptist denomination!
Illinoispastor - too funny
written by rusjen, June 03, 2010
Illinoispastor - I suppose that I am fortunate. I live and serve in VA and I am a proud VA Baptist. I guess that I do have a third way of expressing myself and the VBMB is a group I cherish and feel that I can be associated with.

The national scene and beyond is impossible for me. I was at SBTS when the change over occured. My wife was also a studnet at the time. She felt like she was not welcomed in "real classes", i.e. theology, Greek, Hebrew, OT, NT, etc. We both got our MACE degrees and she was embraced by the education area, but she was vastly shunned by the new group that came in.

Funny thing is, I was welcomed, I was a white man going to seminary. I, however, flunked Greek and struggled in some of the other courses because I had never studied the Bible in such a way before. My undergrad was in American History at a state school and I had never taken one religion course befoer seminary. She was the outstanding studnet and often I was just out standing in a field academically. I was welcomed and she was not.

Division in not God ordained and we seem to continually shoot ourselves in the foot instead of concentrate on reaching people for Christ.
middle ground
written by msr, June 04, 2010
illinoispastor - We certainly don't need more denominations! (I'm pretty sure you were being sarcastic...) But if you are looking for truly moderate expressions of the Baptist faith, the American Baptist Churches, USA as the historical continuation of the Baptist family in the USA (without being landmarkist...) or the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship would probably suit you and those in your position. On my part, I am ABC-USA and Alliance, and thankful for these denominations' commitment to the Gospel as understood by the Baptist tradition - a free gospel that freely brings you to serve God and God's people.
Why Alliance of Baptists?
written by wadotson, June 07, 2010
If The Alliance of Baptist organization is as you state "described as a "genealogy of dissent," embracing controversial stances like full acceptance of gays in civil society and the church, ecumenical cooperation and interfaith dialogue", why pray tell is ABP taking this entire article to report their goings on.
...
written by Big Daddy Weave, June 08, 2010
Perhaps because the Alliance represents a small but loud and influential progressive corner of Baptist life with a rich history, a group that fits comfortably in what David Stricklin dubbed a "genealogy of dissent." A look at Baptist history shows that Baptists outside of the Alliance family have been influenced to some extent by progressive/liberal Baptists from the AoB (and the larger Genealogy of Dissent) in areas such as women-in-ministry, ecumenical cooperation/interfaith dialogue, peace issues, civil rights and views concerning liberty of conscience/soul freedom. A Baptist news organization surely can not ignore this significant progressive voice in our tradition.

As an aside, I'm the historian referred to in the article. You can read my brief history of the Alliance of Baptists on their website: http://www.allianceofbaptists.org/learn/about/history

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.