New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Monday, September 06, 2010
Home arrow Opinion arrow Opinion: A Baptist in a clerical collar?
 
Opinion: A Baptist in a clerical collar? Print E-mail
By Eugene Curry   
Wednesday, July 21, 2010

(ABP) -- Those careers that are part of what may broadly be construed as the “service sector” often involve some means of identification. Policemen sport badges, waiters don aprons and nurses wear scrubs. The idea is that such tell-tale signs allow the proverbial “man on the street” to identify these people and seek out their assistance -- whether that takes the form of a refill of one’s soda or intervention in some transpiring crime.

Traditionally, clergy have also worn some token of their profession. In times past most ministers wore large robes, called cassocks, to identify themselves as representatives of the church. Today cassocks are mostly limited to certain traditions and settings. In contrast, the clerical collar has enjoyed a significantly wider and longer-lasting use among pastors.

By way of example, a clerical collar is still a fairly common symbol of the ministry in popular culture and can be seen sported by such divergent figures as the Rev. Timothy Lovejoy of the animated comedy "The Simpsons," the mysterious Preacher from Clint Eastwood’s gritty Western "Pale Rider" and the mild-mannered Pastor Alden of the classic family TV drama "Little House on the Prairie."

Some may wonder though why pastors would want to distinguish themselves at all. Why would one advertise his “spiritual credentials,” especially in light of the temptation to pride that such a practice can entail? Jesus himself even seems to have decried this very thing -- special clothes and titles for ministers -- as demonstrated by passages such as Matthew 23.

Or did he?

When one looks to Jesus’ words concerning the clergy of his own time, one finds his distinctive use of hyperbole (see Matt. 5:29-30, 17:20 and Luke 14:26). This interpretation is necessary, for otherwise the God-ordained uniform for the priests of the Old Testament (Ex. 28:1-2) and the willingness of New Testament authors to refer to themselves and others by the title “leader” (Heb. 13:7) and even “father” (I Cor. 4:15) would be rather difficult to explain.

And if this is the case, then we can see that Jesus didn’t so much condemn the Pharisees’ externals as the discontinuity between their outward presentation and their inward disposition. That is, Jesus’ objection to the Pharisees seems to be that while they were willing to “lengthen their tassels” and “broaden their phylacteries,” they also “devour[ed] widows’ houses.”

Jesus’ critique of the Pharisees is aptly summed up Matthew 23:25 and 28: “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence.” And, “you, too, outwardly appear righteous to men, but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness.” Jesus’ main concern then was not with attire and titles at all, but with a lack of consistency.

Even so, are there any benefits to wearing a clerical collar? Or, with an eye toward Paul’s words to the Corinthians, even though such a practice may be permissible, is it helpful?

From personal experience, the answer is an unequivocal “yes.”

A collar advertises to everyone (including the minister himself) what he is and, more importantly, for whom he stands. A good example of this occurred at a ministerial prayer meeting in which I participated a while back. I was by far the youngest person present in a room of experienced and distinguished ministers. And yet, when a woman wandered in off the street looking for prayer, she panned across the room, saw me, and remarked, “Oh, a collar; you must be someone important.” She approached me because I was the only one in the room “flying the flag.”

This kind of recognition is particularly helpful during pastoral visits. In my own ministry I have found that a collar allows me, for instance, access to hospital patients that are off-limits even to their own families.

The collar is also something of a conversation starter, which lends itself very nicely to evangelism. On one occasion I stopped in at a grocery store on my way home from a meeting and, while I was standing in line, the cashier leaned over to the bagger and whispered, “I need to go back to church.”

Of course, Christ’s words still stand. A good show on the outside means nothing unless it is accompanied by faithfulness, virtue and humility on the inside. This is something no Christian, ordained or lay, ought to forget.

But as a minister I would encourage my fellow pastors to consider wearing a clerical collar in certain, appropriate situations. Who knows? Your congregation may enjoy it -- and I’m sure that LifeWay (which sells clerical collars) would appreciate the business.

-30-

Eugene Curry is senior pastor of the First Baptist Church of Granada Hills in Los Angeles. This commentary is adapted from a post on his blog.

EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER: As part of our mission to provide credible and compelling information about matters of faith, Associated Baptist Press actively seeks a diversity of viewpoints in its columns, commentaries and other opinion-based content. Opinions expressed in these articles are not intended to represent ABP editorial policy and do not necessarily reflect the views of ABP’s staff, board of directors or supporters.

 





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (8)Add Comment
...
written by KT2005, July 21, 2010
Hmmmm. Great article! Made me think.
...
written by rightrevrick, July 21, 2010
I believe there are more and more Baptist preachers who would like the idea of wearing clergical collars. It would look good on TV.

"Pale Rider" and "Simpsons" aside, I would hate to see that begin as a new trend in Baptist ranks. One of the more distinguishing and admirable characteristics of being "Baptist" is the position that "clergy" is simply part of the ranks and files of church members who are called by God to serve as shepherds. The desire from that standpoint is to stay away from the pharisaic practices of elevating spiritual leaders into some sort of transcendent holy people with their heads in the clouds. Wearing distinguishing clothes and artifacts lend to that happening.

As far as having a distinguishable mark to attract those in need of counseling or seeking spiritual answers to their questions, ALL Baptists should practice life styles that pronounce their association with Jesus Christ. See the difference? Without using cloaks and collars leaders can associate and relate with those that we lead and better model how our lives should protray that we are Children of the Most High God.

The argument can better be made that if a member of the clergy DOES wear a collar he will ALIENATE those in need of Christian counsel and witness. Just try telling the businessman sitting next to you on a plane that you are a "PREACHER" when they ask what you do.

But given an appropriate heart of humility I'm sure that wearing a collar or a huge Cross bling with a crucified Jesus on it would not be a sin. Go for it!
In reply to rightrevrick...
written by Eugene Curry, July 22, 2010
"The argument can better be made that if a member of the clergy DOES wear a collar he will ALIENATE those in need of Christian counsel and witness."

I've encountered this view before, but I've always felt that such concerns are based on a false premise. The thinking behind the objection seems to be thus: If not for some potentially alienating identifying mark of a minister's vocation (such as a collar) passerbys would gladly approach a pastor for spiritual counsel.

But clearly there's a problem here. After all, if it wasn't for some visible token of a minister's vocation, how would a passerby even know that there is a minister present to be approached in the first place?
...
written by wymanrichardson, July 23, 2010
As for "the pharisaic practices of elevating spiritual leaders into some sort of transcendent holy people with their heads in the clouds," I daresay that more than a few Baptist clergy have achieved this without getting near collars! (And, btw, I speak as a Baptist pastor.) In truth, it would be telling if a (impossible) study could be conducted measuring the relative pharisaicalness and head-in-the-cloudsness of clergy who wear collars and those who don't. Who thinks that, on the whole, Baptist pastors would just run away from their be-collared cohorts in the humility department? I remain unconvinced.

Good article, Eugene Curry. I don't wear a collar. It would not work in my context (I don't think, anyway). But you've thought it through well and I wish you all the best.
...
written by GregF, July 23, 2010
Retro and chic! What's not to like!?!
...
written by Anita H, July 23, 2010
"...In my own ministry I have found that a collar allows me, for instance, access to hospital patients that are off-limits even to their own families...."

Eugene, you may think it's the collar that did the trick, but actually it was most likely a combination of the circumstances plus how you presented yourself as a caring professional. Free-ranging folks who simply want to wander the halls know where to buy those collars, too. Consequently, with or without a collar, you'll need to identify yourself as to who you are and the name of the patient you're there to visit.

At that point, the hospital staff will generally do whatever they can to facilitate a visit that's going to help a patient receive their preferred religious or spiritual care, or a patient's family receive the care that helps them during tough times.

A gracious "pastoral presence" -- however it's packaged -- goes a long way in helping pastors be present to care for members of their flock during a crisis.

All the best in your ministry --
Chaplain Anita
...
written by Pastor Andy, July 28, 2010
I think Martin Luther might just be rolling over in his grave. One major thing that marks us different from the Church of Rome is "the priesthood of all believers" and this is just one more thing that makes people feel that we (clergy) are more special then those in the pews.

The fact is that we are all level at the foot of the cross and in order to effectively proclaim Christ it is important that there are no walls between us and those that need Jesus.

I can appriciate that when someone sees a collar then might ask about you and your church or even think they need to go back to church, but I'm willing to bet that more will have an opposite response.

It may also allow you to get into areas in hospitals, but so does a name tag that has your name and church.
...
written by Eugene Curry, August 05, 2010
The two largest Lutheran groups in the world are the Lutheran World Federation (LWF) and the International Lutheran Council (ILC). Both groups are overarching structures which include various specific Lutheran denominations in much the same way that the Baptist World Alliance does with Baptist denominations.

The LWF includes a number of, generally speaking, more liberal groups and the established Lutheran churches of Europe like the Church of Sweden and the Church of Denmark. Until this year the President of the LWF was a man named Mark Hanson, the Presiding Bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America—America’s largest Lutheran denomination—but in July Hanson handed the LWF’s leadership over to Munib Younan, bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Jordan and the Holy Land.

The ILC is a more conservative group and its current chairman is Gerald Kieschnick, president of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod. Interestingly, the LCMS also recently had an election and its new President-Elect is a man named Matthew Harrison.

All four of these men—Hanson, Younan, Kieschnick, and Harrison—wear clerical collars. So I rather doubt that Luther would have opposed such neckwear, especially not with reference to the “priesthood of all believers.” But if I’m wrong it would seem that I’d be the least of Luther’s collared frustrations.

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.