New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Home arrow News arrow Young evangelicals call for end to nuclear weapons
 
Young evangelicals call for end to nuclear weapons Print E-mail
By Bob Allen   
Tuesday, April 28, 2009

AUSTIN, Texas (ABP) -- A group of under-40 evangelicals attending a leadership meeting in Texas announced April 28 a new initiative to mobilize American Christians to eliminate nuclear weapons.

"We have all heard about this broadening of the evangelical agenda," said Katie Paris of Faith in Public Life, a progressive group for advancing faith in the public square. "Today something new is happening. Younger Christians are setting the agenda -- elevating and acting on an issue that has been off the popular radar for decades. They are engaging politics in a way that is very different from the generation that came before them, defying easy political categorization and breaking through theological division."

Tyler Wigg-Stevenson
Tyler Wigg-Stevenson, 31, an ordained Baptist minister and member of First Baptist Church in Nashville, Tenn., is the founding director of the Two Futures Project, a movement of American Christians calling for the global abolition of nuclear weapons.

"The truth that has been recognized in foreign-policy circles over the past several years must now make its way into the public consciousness," he said in a conference call with reporters to announce the initiative. "In a post 9/11 era the weapons that we relied upon as our ultimate ace in the hole have in fact become the greatest threat to us all."

Wigg-Stevenson said the doctrine of mutually assured destruction that produced a stalemate between the United States and Soviet Union during the Cold War "is now obsolete."

"A two-tiered world of nuclear haves and have-nots will eventually lead to uncontrollable proliferation and an un-deterrable terrorist bomb," he said, "which would not only cause mass casualties, but catastrophic economic effects that would leave no corner of the planet untouched."

Wigg-Stevenson said nuclear weapons touch on a number of Christian moral concerns, including protection of innocent life, care for creation and concern for the poor. He labeled reliance on weapons of mass destruction "enacted blasphemy."

"Who do we think we are to claim authority over life itself and the welfare of future generations?" he asked. "That power belongs to God alone."

Jonathan Merritt, national spokesperson for the Southern Baptist Environment and Climate Initiative, spoke in support of the initiative.

"Nuclear weapons are not only unacceptable, they are un-Christian," Merritt said. "As followers of Jesus we serve a God that abhors the shedding of innocent blood."

"We understand that those that will be affected by the detonation of a nuclear bomb are not numbers," Merritt said. "They are objects of God's love, wonderful creations made in his image."

Merritt said he is aware that some people think the goal of eliminating nuclear weapons worldwide is impossible.

"Calling something impossible is often a tool of distraction employed by those who simply lack moral courage," he said. "As Christians, our decisions must be made on morality, not plausibility. We serve a God through which all things are possible. So when Christians hide behind the skirt of probability, it is the ultimate act of distrust."

Merritt said he supports the Two Futures Project as a Southern Baptist, citing the 2000 Baptist Faith & Message article calling it the duty of Christians to seek peace and do all in their power to end war.

Jonathan Merritt

"Southern Baptists have always placed immense value on human life, which is an important part of the pursuit of peace," Merritt said. "Therefore I find this effort wholly consistent with both my theological convictions and a long-held Baptist belief."

Merritt said he also supports the initiative as a "member of a rising generation of Christ-followers who engage public policy differently than the generation that came before us."

"As we attempt to mirror the ministry of Jesus Christ by promoting compassion and justice and peace, we seek to transcend partisanship, and we welcome the opportunity to partner with people of mutual good will," he said.

Merritt, 26, the son of former Southern Baptist Convention president James Merritt, drew criticism from denominational leaders in March 2008 for spearheading the environmental declaration criticizing SBC resolutions as too timid on the issue of climate change.

Recently Merritt wrote an opinion article in USA Today saying Christians should show more compassion to gays. The SBC Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission responded with an e-mail to state-convention ethics leaders citing criticism by the convention's "gender-issues specialist," Bob Stith. Stith said Merritt's article did a "disservice" to evangelicals who are "actively engaged in loving outreach to homosexuals," including the SBC's own Task Force on Ministry to Homosexuals, formed in 2001.

Merritt told Associated Baptist Press he does not expect similar criticism for supporting the Two Futures initiative, because it is endorsed by prominent conservative voices including Prison Fellowship founder Charles Colson.

The Southern Baptist Convention adopted resolutions supporting multilateral nuclear disarmament in 1978, 1979, 1982 and 1983. 

The most recent Southern Baptist resolution mentioning nuclear weapons came in 2002. It urged national leaders to prevent terrorist-supporting nations from attaining weapons of mass destruction.

Merritt said he "would love to see" a new SBC resolution affirming those previous stands.

Wigg-Stevenson, author of Brand Jesus: Christianity in a Consumerist Age and articles in magazines including Christianity Today, Relevant and Sojourners, unveiled the Two Futures Project at the Q conference, a gathering in Austin, Texas, of about 500 Christian leaders interested in engaging culture for common good.

Wigg-Stevenson said he received "an astonishing amount of support" from across the theological and political spectrum. He said in the last few days he received invitations to speak in churches with combined memberships of more than 20,000 people.

-30-

Bob Allen is senior writer for Associated Baptist Press.





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (12)Add Comment
typical
written by Dr. J, April 28, 2009
Typical of the young and naive.
They're too young to remember Carter.
written by Ken, April 29, 2009
As I recall, Jimmy Carter was really into disarmament when he was president. The problem is, these younger evangelicals are too young to remember what a feckless president he really was. Do we really want to go back to those days, when America was the world's doormat?

How do these young evangelicals propose to rid the world of nuclear weapons? Through peace treaties? Do they really believe terrorist states will honor treaties? If so, their attitude goes beyond naivete to outright stupidity.

Peace treaties are based on the unscriptural premise that human beings are naturally good (see Romans 3:10). That is why they never work.
Encouraging
written by David Cassady, April 29, 2009
I'm very encouraged by the willingness of these young people show their faith that Jesus' way is more powerful than the power of governments, military action or the work of powerful leaders.

Is such thinking naive or silly? Perhaps. But then, Jesus' entire life was given (literally) to show that a life of following God through serving, healing, giving and loving can overcome even death.
David
written by Ken, April 29, 2009
"But then, Jesus' entire life was given (literally) to show that a life of following God through serving, healing, giving and loving can overcome even death."

Excuse me? I think you need to read your Bible a little more carefully.
...
written by Ray, April 30, 2009
David,

Are you suggesting that Jesus did not conquer death? Maybe you should read your Bible :)

Grace and Peace
...
written by Ray, April 30, 2009
I meant to write that to Ken. Sorry!
Ray
written by Ken, April 30, 2009
"Are you suggesting that Jesus did not conquer death? Maybe you should read your Bible :)"

I didn't say any such thing, and I'll thank you not to put words in my mouth. That is the tactic of cowards.

Here are David's exact words: "But then, Jesus' entire life was given (literally) to show that a life of following God through serving, healing, giving and loving can overcome even death."

Jesus gave His life to pay the penalty for our sins. He conquered death because He is God's Son, not because He of His "following GOd through serving, healing, giving, and loving."

What all of this has to do with nuclear disarmament, I don't know. David didn't make that clear.
The Power of Love
written by david, May 01, 2009
Hi Ken,

Sorry if I was unclear. I guess what I was trying to underscore was the way Jesus flipped the world's understanding of power on its head. Nuclear weapons are about power... incredible amounts of power.

The incarnation brings God to earth not as a powerful king or conquering general (as even many in Israel of the day expected), but as a fragile and vulnerable child. When in the wilderness, we see Jesus tempted to grab and use power in different ways. Jesus, I believe, spent his entire life (and death) demonstrating that the love of God "is" the real power in the universe, and overwhelms the earthly understanding of power as force, violence, coercion, etc. His resurrection showed that the worst power people can wield (injustice, violence, betrayal, denial, torture, killing...) are easily overcome by God's love.

Yes, Jesus shows God's grace in the face of our sin. And that grace reminds us that our trust should be in God's love, not in the world's understanding of power -- which includes nuclear weapons.

I hope that's a bit clearer! Thanks for giving me an opportunity to more fully explain my thoughts. Peace to you...
I'm old enough to remember Carter
written by droslovinia, May 03, 2009
Ken, could you please enlighten me as to exactly when America has been a "doormat" since WWII? We bulked up on enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world several times over, our corporations have long controlled a disportionate amount of the world's resources, and our people have log enjoyed the highest standard of living in the world. In what way have we ever been as bad off as you would claim?

I'm more with Dr. J. Not that these folk are wrong, but they're about 20 years late to the conversation. Nuclear weapons are still a horrible evil, but they are born of a fear and intolerance that comes from a lack of faith, and that is still being expressed through a wide array of social evils. Given as how recent surveys show that the majority of Baptists still support torture, we're hardly in a place where we can address them all.
...
written by jeremy, May 04, 2009
The church is the most well connected and well funded body in the world. You do not need signed peace treaties when the actions of millions point in one direction. We recently haven't done so well with the treaties that we have signed anyway.
I'm excited to see these people taking a stand against nuclear weapons. We have been called to create the Kingdom of God with the power of the Holy Spirit as our guide and I don't see how nuclear weaponry fits into the Kingdom of God. In living this call out we are responsible to follow our call and not what others might make of this call.
I wish that this sentiment was "typical" of a younger generation. We need more people to be "young and naive" to break the way in which we govern ourselves through fear.
droslovinia
written by Ken, May 05, 2009
"Ken, could you please enlighten me as to exactly when America has been a "doormat" since WWII?"

I take it you don't remember the Iranian hostage crisis? That's just one example among many. I'm not suggesting Carter was entirely to blame for our weakness - he wasn't - but he certainly didn't help.

"I'm more with Dr. J."

I doubt it. On a separate thread, Dr. J compared nuclear disarmament to gun control. I think he said something along the lines of, "If nuclear weapons are banned, only terrorists will have them." (Dr. J, forgive me if that's not an exact quote, but I think that's essentially what you said).

Dr. J and I have had some pretty strong disagreements in the past, but I think we're more-or-less on the same page with this issue.
David
written by Ken, May 05, 2009
"[Jesus'] resurrection showed that the worst power people can wield (injustice, violence, betrayal, denial, torture, killing...) are easily overcome by God's love."

Huh??? I don't mean any disrespect, but I still think you have missed the whole point of Jesus' resurrection. He rose from the dead to show that He was who He claimed to be, not to show the power of God's love. God's love didn't prevent people from killing Jesus, nor did it prevent the early Christians from being martyred.

I'm well-aware of what Jesus said about turning the other cheek and "blessed are the peacemakers", but peace take those verses completely out of context. He was talking about personal relationships, not national security.

I repeat, peace treaties are based on the notion that people have a natural desire to get along and do the right thing. Such a notion is not only naive, it is flagrantly contrary to Scripture (Rom. 3:10ff). This world is still the devil's domain, and will be until Christ returns. Disarming ourselves will only invite terrorists to destroy us.


Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.