New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
Home arrow News arrow Seminary president says smaller families hurting baptism totals
 
Seminary president says smaller families hurting baptism totals Print E-mail
By Bob Allen   
Tuesday, June 09, 2009

WAKE FOREST, N.C. (ABP) -- A seminary president calling for a "Great Commission Resurgence" in the Southern Baptist Convention says reversing the denomination's declining baptism totals is a matter not merely of evangelism, but also birthrates.  

Most attention to a Great Commission Resurgence petition that has collected more than 3,000 online signatures leading up to the June 23-24 SBC annual meeting has focused on an article suggesting streamlining the denomination's bureaucracy. Another less-discussed section, however, hits closer to home for Baptist families.

The last of 10 articles in the much-discussed petition calls for commitment to "build gospel-saturated homes that see children as a gift from God and as our first mission field."

It says too many Southern Baptists "have embraced unbiblical notions about marriage and family," including that "children are a burden rather than a blessing and smaller families are more 'responsible' than large families."

In an April 16 chapel address at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary that started the discussion, seminary President Daniel Akin was more explicit. 

"Southern Baptists have been seduced by the sirens of modernity in a very important place," he said. "We have been seduced in how we do family and how many we should have in the home."

"For example, we have been seduced with respect to the gift of children, who often now even in our churches are viewed as a burden, not a blessing," Akin said. "Less is best, or at least less is better. The result is we have less children."

Akin said another seminary president, Albert Mohler of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, showed him statistics that declining baptisms paralleled the trend toward Southern Baptists having smaller families.

Akin said he remembered when he was a seminary student and Bertha Smith, an iconic Southern Baptist missionary who died in 1988, "scared the daylights" out of seminarians by telling them that using birth control is a sin.

"God killed Onan for it and he might kill you too," Akin recalled her as saying, a reference to story from Genesis about a man whom God kills for refusing his obligation to sire a child for his sister-in-law after his brother died. "Then she said this, 'Listen, we will never win the battle against the religion of Islam, because they have children and we don't. And it's a very simple matter of mathematics. Eventually they will outnumber us.' She was a prophetess."

Akin said that is demonstrated by looking no farther than Europe. "Islam will take over Europe and it will never fire a shot," he said. "They will simply outnumber them as white Europeans have less or no children, and Muslims continue to have them at a very large, healthy rate."

"You say, 'What are you saying?' I'm saying you need to have a bunch of kids," Akin said. "It has a missiological motivation."

Neither Akin nor SBC President Johnny Hunt, the co-author of the current document, which has undergone revisions since its original posting, responded to recent e-mails asking for elaboration on whether SBC leaders were telling church members they ought to have more children.

Akin told a Baptist blogger, Trevin Wax, associate pastor of First Baptist Church in Shelbyville, Tenn., that he is not saying "the way we need to evangelize the world is to have more children ... period," but, "We do need to have more children and faithfully teach them the gospel and the Christian scriptures."

Akin said he is not for baptizing children at a very young age, but the fact is that about half of baptisms of older youth and adults are rebaptisms of children who were first baptized at a young age. Since there are fewer children, he said, that number is shrinking.

"You put all that together with the fact that we are less passionate about the plight of the lost and you see why there is a significant decline and stagnation in baptisms," he said. "We have not been keeping up with the population growth in America for 30 to 40 years now. Even though we saw modest increases in the number of churches, and modest increases in terms of total membership, we were losing ground every step of the way."

Akin said pastors "should teach the Scriptures and point out that Psalm 128 talks about the beautiful gift that children are from the Lord. God blesses the one who has a large number of them. The psalmist uses different analogies of the quiver full or the olive plants around the home."

"Pastors should acknowledge that we do have a culture mandate to be fruitful and multiply and that the Scriptures consistently witness to the fact that children are a good gift from a great God," he said. "They are a prime avenue and a prime mission field.

"In fact, in my axioms message, I said that our first line of doing missions is our own families. Of course, if you have one child as opposed to four, five or six, then you have a much smaller initial mission field."

-30-

Bob Allen is senior writer for Associated Baptist Press.

Previous related ABP story:

'Great Commission Resurgence' author says SBC needs overhaul (5/22)





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (9)Add Comment
Is akin mentally disturbed?
written by Slick, June 10, 2009
There are those with read AB Press online who have accused it of attempts to malign the SBC. I don’t know if this is such but if the reporting is complete and accurate, I wonder if Dannyboy Akin wasn’t experience some mental problems when he made these statements. How totally absurd! For anyone to promote having more children than one can appropriately rear and support is ludicrous. It is even more laughable to suggest or even hint that Baptist ought to have more children just so we can have more Baptisms to pat ourselves on the back about. Akin and a few other SBC seminary presidents need to stop playing God and just manage their schools.
No, Akin is not disturbed...he's just misrepresented.
written by Vitri Ly, June 10, 2009
I'm a college student at Southeastern, I'd ask that anyone who is reading this page to just download the original sermon from here - http://apps.sebts.edu/chmessages/resource_2452/04-16-09_Dr_Daniel_L_Akin.mp3...and start listening from 36:10, that is when he's getting to his seventh point about children.

Akin only used the baptism reference as an example for his point that we view children as a burden and a curse instead of blessing. If you ask Akin directly, I'm sure he would not say that he is seeking to pat ourselves on the back for having more baptism. And I seriously doubt Akin would agree with the person he quoted that using birth control is a sin, he was quoting someone just to make a point, and I have never heard him or any other professors at Southeastern say that, they're not Catholics. Though some things said within the article is true, the title and first paragraph will throw many people off. At best, the writer wanted to catch some attention with the title, at worst, the writer has some beef with Akin. Anyone reading this - listen to the original message before forming an opinion.

This is the manuscript of his message.
VII. We must covenant to build gospel saturated homes that see children as a gift from God and as our first and primary mission field. (Deut. 6:1-9; Psalm 127; 128; Eph. 6:4)

* Southern Baptists have been seduced by the sirens of modernity in a very important place. We have been seduced in how we do family and how many we should have in the home.
* We have been seduced with respect to the gift of children.

- Children are a burden not a blessing.
- Less is best or at least less is better.
- Result: have less children! **(This is when he went off on a tangent about baptism and Islam in Europe, etc., but it wasn't the main point of it)**

* We have been seduced with respect to the importance of motherhood.

- It is an inferior calling.
- It can be delegated, at least in part, to another.

* We have been seduced with respect to the role of dad.

- He is a bumbling idiot.
- He is not necessary, maybe not even needed.

* We have been seduced with respect to what a good home is and does. Let me clarify what a good home looks like:

- It loves Jesus.
- It honors God.
- It teaches the Bible.
- It casts a vision for spiritual greatness.
- It has fun!
- It let’s go so that our children may soar for the glory of God!
I agree with Slick
written by tmarsh0307, June 10, 2009
Vitri Ly,

Regardless of how you "represent" Akin, his statements are irresponsible.

First, it is true that parenthood is portrayed as a less than noble vocation. Also, it is true that many consider children a burden rather than a blessing. Look at our churches when we go to get volunteers for nursery and children's programs.

However, to conclude that these are the reasons people have less children than 50-100 years ago is ludicrous. And, to insenuate that the proper response of a faithful Christian is to have more children is even more ludicrous. We live in a day and age where college tuitions are soaring, insurance premiums are sky rocketing, and the cost of food continues to rise.

Do you think that we also need to encourage Baptists to return to the farm, send only one or two kids to college and ensure that the remainder of the children live their lives on the farm or work in labor jobs? Farming and labor jobs are increasingly lower paying. They are fine, if that is what they want. But they should at least have the choice, and the parents should provide towards that choice.

These jobs are fine, if that is what you want.

This is merely another SBC tactic to vindicate the culture of the 1950's. It is irresponsible to encourage families to have more children when they cannot afford to provide what is best for these children.

Furthermore, if you use your imagination about this call to have larger families and more children, one may deduce even more disturbing motives behind such a call, as the tangent toward Europe and Islam suggests.

Vitri Ly
written by Ken, June 10, 2009
Thanks for setting the record straight. Unfortunately, some people obviously don't like to be deterred with facts.
Context is Important, but...
written by tmarsh0307, June 11, 2009
Ken,

My concerns follow Vitri Ly's provision of Akin's "context" of his comments. Even after reading Vitri Ly, I still have serious concerns about Akin's comments.

Furthermore, the Great Commission Resurgence document contained comments regarding Baptists having less children. What is the motivation behind it?
I would disagree with Akin if that was his message, too.
written by Vitri Ly, June 11, 2009
I'm from Vietnam, my family has been in the US for almost nine years. During those time, we've saved enough money to buy a nice house, 3 cars (fully paid for two of them)...my family has never made more than 5k a month. I'm going to college, and my family is supporting me financially since I can't get loans.

What does that have to do with anything? Well, the way my family live is completely different than the way many Americans live. I don't think anyone is seriously entertaining the idea that we should have more kids than we can support. However, what typically happens with many American families is that the father has bunch of "hobbies" that cost a lot, the mother is obsessed with the house and wants to fill it with "stuff" or is vain and is always at nail salon, etc.. Neither my dad or my mom spends much of their money on themselves, all their money goes towards the "family" and their two kids. They just weren't raised to have the "American dream", they were raised to always put their family first. And I'm not saying that all Christian families are like these, but many Christian parents are not "dying" to themselves. Among other wasteful spending (no one needs a BM, or Benz, or a pool in their backyard, etc., etc., drive a van, go to public pool), many American families just are not wise with their money...and they wonder where their money is going. This is just not a Christian view, turn on the news when they start talking and you'll also hear them talking about Americans not being wise with their money.

I agree with if we can't afford to have more kids, we shouldn't. What I'm trying to say is that many Can afford to have more kids, but they are just foolish with money.

However, to conclude that these are the reasons people have less children than 50-100 years ago is ludicrous.

How so? Please explain. That is what we see in across Europe, that's why the gov't offers incentives for people to have kids, shrinking workforce in Europe is why Muslims are in Europe as companies end up having to get people to come into the country to work. That's the problem with Russia, Singapore, Japan. People simply don't want to have kids, whether they can afford it or not. That's also what's going in more "progressive" cities in this country (http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-03-13-babybust_x.htm)...so why is the conclusion that many of us see children more as a curse instead of blessing...wrong?
Vitri Ly, Thank You
written by tmarsh0307, June 11, 2009
Thank you for your first and second paragraphs about your personal testimony and your perception of the American family. I could not agree with you more. Vanity is behind this kind of thinking.

However, in the United States people who lived in rural areas and were raised on farms had large families because it supported the family industry, plain and simple. A child was another farm hand. The more children, the better off the family was economically.

Now, this is not so in the United States. To get decent jobs most everyone must go to college or a trade school. Masters Degrees are becoming necessary for many fields. Having more children

I have other concerns regarding the call to have more children that I will not print on this website. I hope that many can read between the lines of these comments. I will leave it at that.
Third Paragraph
written by tmarsh0307, June 11, 2009
Sorry...

Having more children is an expense rather than an economic benefit because of the cost to support a child. It is simply responsible to have less children today.

I agree that we probably can support more than what we actually do. If so, adopt. Take on a child that is unwanted.

However, to call into question birth control, planned parenting and other methods to responsibly bring children into the world is a recipe for disaster. At best, it is irresponsible. At worse, children may grow up disadvantaged.
Someone...
written by Nathan, June 12, 2009
please tell the seminary presidents the difference between "less" and "fewer."

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.