New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Home arrow News arrow LifeWay says 1 in 8 church background checks finds record
 
LifeWay says 1 in 8 church background checks finds record Print E-mail
By Bob Allen   
Friday, August 07, 2009

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (ABP) -- One in eight background checks conducted on volunteers or prospective employees through LifeWay Christian Resources found a criminal history that might have kept an individual from working or volunteering at a church, the Southern Baptist Convention publishing house reported Aug. 4.

SNAP activists picketed outside the 2007 SBC annual meeting in San Antonio to draw awareness to sexual abuse by clergy. After this photo was taken, they say, an SBC official ordered them out of the shade on the convention center plaza and onto a public sidewalk in 95-degree heat and full sun. (StopBaptistPredators.org)

Last year LifeWay negotiated an affinity-group discount for screening services for churches with Backgroundchecks.com, a 10-year-old company with 4,500 clients. Since then, according to a news release, about 450 churches requested more than 5,000 background checks on volunteers and prospective employees.

While most screenings returned clean records or only minor traffic offenses, LifeWay said, 80 found serious felony offenses and more than 600 people had some type of criminal history that may have disqualified them from volunteering or working at a church.

While not a statistically representative sample, 450 churches is 1 percent of the 44,848 Southern Baptist congregations claimed in LifeWay's most recent Annual Church Profile. Projected onto the other 99 percent of Southern Baptist churches, that would add up to 8,000 serious felony offenses and more than 60,000 people with some sort of checkered past in churches across the convention.

"It is so important in this day and time to run these checks," Barbara Strong, church secretary at Jubilee Worship Center in Westmoreland, Tenn., said in the press release. "We just don't know who is coming into our church. We'd like to think everyone is a good Christian, but we can't know that."

Since Southern Baptist churches are self-governing, the denomination doesn't screen prospective employees or volunteers for them. The SBC Executive Committee "strongly advises" churches to be diligent in choosing leaders and volunteers, however, and includes a link on the convention's website to the Department of Justice Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website.

While vital, experts say sex-offender registries alone aren't very effective in spotting sexual predators. They list only those convicted of a crime. Because victims typically are reluctant to come forward and with statutes of limitations on molestation laws in many states, only an estimated 10 percent of sexual predators are brought to justice.

Of 13,000 Catholic clergy "credibly accused" in the pedophile-priest scandal that rocked the Roman Catholic Church during the last decade, about 6 percent were even investigated by police.

According to a 2004 study by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, about 4 percent of Catholic priests who served in the United States since 1950 had been accused of sexually abusing minors.

While hard numbers are lacking for other religious groups, Philip Jenkins, a professor at Penn State University, has estimated the figure among Protestant clergy at between 2 percent and 3 percent.

In 2007 the Associated Press polled three major insurers for Protestant churches and totaled claims of minors being sexually abused by clergy, staff or other church-related relations at about 260 reports a year. That's a higher number than the average of the 228 credible accusations against Catholic priests per year reported in the John Jay study.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops responded to its scandal by appointing a 12-member National Review Board, a laity-led panel that monitors and reports incidents of sexual abuse by clergy.

Prodded by the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, the same group that pressured the Catholic Church to take action, Southern Baptist leaders last year discussed the feasibility of a similar nationwide system.

In the end, the SBC Executive Committee decided that given Southern Baptists' free-wheeling style of congregational governance, the denomination lacked "jurisdictional authority" to involve itself in receiving and evaluating reports of abuse within local churches.

Instead the Executive Committee sought to bolster awareness of the issue by creating a resource page for prevention of sexual abuse on the SBC.net website and dedicating an entire issue of SBC Life, a newspaper sent to pastors and other church leaders, to "protecting our children."

The Centers for Disease Control say background checks are only one tool in screening and selection of church workers. By themselves, they can be counterproductive, creating a false sense of security.

They recommend guidelines on interactions between individuals, such as a "6/2" rule, a policy that states anyone working with children or youth must be an active member of your church for at least six months before assuming a position of leadership and that there be at least two non-related adults in the room with minors at all times.

Other safeguards include monitoring and supervision, ensuring safe environments for children, having a plan in place to respond to inappropriate behavior and training about prevention of child sexual abuse.

The SBC Executive Committee urges churches to vigorously investigate any known or suspected incidents of abuse and to report them immediately to "governing authorities."

To delay reporting in order to avoid embarrassment to the church or to extend mercy to the accused is "unjustified" in cases involving potential child abuse, the committee says.

"Children are our precious commodity," Wayne Rogers, associate pastor of First Baptist Church in Estero, Fla., said in the LifeWay press release. "They've been entrusted to us, and we have to protect them at any cost."

-30-

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it  is senior writer for Associated Baptist Press.





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (5)Add Comment
Interesting
written by Slick, August 10, 2009
Some have accused APB of beating up the SBC and the picture and cutlines may be an effort to do that. That's not good journalism in my opinion. The basic article doesn't seem significant. okay, so there are people in the church who sinned in the past. Church is where they ought to be. And each congregation should determine how it wants to deal with those who may have missed the mark in the past. Does past sin disqualify one from serving the Lord? Is only Saul of Tarsus allowed to serve God as a leader and one who carries His message? In fact sinners are forgiven and restored by God every day. Those sinners can be useful to Him and His continuing work in this world. Should everyone who has repented and been restored be allowed to serve in any capacity in a church? Probably not but if it's a Baptist congregation of any stripe it's up to that local congregation to decide how its members can serve and in what capacity.

Background checks can be a good thing. The local church has is members to be concerned about as well as an interest in avoiding legal action when a volunteer leader or staff member causes harm to another in the church.

It's not about just Southern Baptists. It's not about just Baptist. Every denomination, in all likelihood, is bound to have members with felonies and other documented, proven crimes in their past. Let’s not think this is just a Baptist issue.
...
written by LifeWayNews, August 10, 2009
The story above by Bob Allen is written largely from information and quotes supplied in a news release distributed by LifeWay on Aug. 4. (original release: http://www.lifeway.com/article/?id=169449). After that release was distributed to LifeWay’s media contacts, Mr. Allen e-mailed LifeWay asking for clarification on the statistics and drawing the same inaccurate conclusions as he ultimately published in this article. LifeWay responded with the e-mail below:

Bob,

I appreciate your careful assessment. However, the 450 churches that comprise the base for the stats below [as referenced in Mr. Allen's e-mail] are not necessarily a representative sample of all Southern Baptist churches. They are simply the roughly 450 churches that have used the service since LifeWay began offering it in 2008. That means that multiplying the figures out with reference to the entire church base of SBC churches provides false numbers. If the sample HAD been representative of the entire SBC, you could possibly draw the conclusions that you have mentioned.

It's possible that the 450 churches who use backgroundchecks.com are located in areas with a higher than normal prevalence of criminal activity and/or criminal background. I hope that clarifies things for you.

Please let me know if you have questions.


We received no further communication from Mr. Allen and then saw this article stating the same statistics we had already corrected. In addition to the information contained in our e-mail response, there is no indication in LifeWay’s original news release that all 450 churches are even Southern Baptist churches. The backgroundchecks.com service is provided through LifeWay to any church customer that chooses to utilize it ... it is inaccurate to assume that all 450 customers are Southern Baptist churches or that the statistics can be used to assess the condition of all Southern Baptist churches.
Misleading
written by Slick, August 10, 2009
Thanks, Lifeway for the rest of the story. I knew the paragraph about projecting known figures to all SBC churches was totally misleading. While correctly stated with the disclaimer of not being a statistically representative sample, the implication is unwarranted. Anyone with even a basic college-level research course to his/her credit would have quickly noticed the fallacy.

How about projecting to all churches? How about breaking down by urban and rural settings? Affluent and modest? State by state? If this was an attempt to castigate the SBC or just shoddy journalism, it is unfortunately misleading.
Sampling errors can cut both ways
written by christa, August 11, 2009
LifeWay complains that it wasn't a statistically representative sample and posits the possibility that the 450 churches in the sample may have been churches with a higher than normal prevalence of criminal activity. However, if it wasn't a statistically representative sample, then there is at least an equal possibility that the 450 churches may have been churches with a LOWER than normal prevalence of criminal activity. This would mean that the average of criminal conduct for all churches might be even HIGHER than what is reflected in this sampling of 450 churches. Sampling errors can cut both ways.
Bad journalism
written by Slick, August 11, 2009
The comment above on sampling errors adds to the notion that there was considerable and inappropriate bias in the original so-called news story. It probably should have been identified as opinion. The article also fails to note that congregations use other services besides backgroundchecks.com or that some of these services are more in-depth than others.

The picture with its cutlines and paragraphs 4 should have been omitted from this article. What about American Baptist? what about the CBF? Missionary Baptist? Foot-washing Baptist? National Baptist? Let's don't forget all those independent Baptists out there. Should I go on? Are US Roman Catholics and Southern Baptists the only church organizations with staff members/volunteers who misbehave or have members with soil in their backgrounds? Seems to be a bit ingenuous to only keep the SBC and RC on the radar scope.

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.