New Voice Media | Associated Baptist Press
     
 
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
Home arrow Opinion arrow Opinion: Grief, the past, and creating a future for moderate Baptists
 
Opinion: Grief, the past, and creating a future for moderate Baptists Print E-mail
By Cody Sanders   
Tuesday, September 22, 2009

(ABP) -- I’ve been thinking a lot recently about the future of the moderate Baptist movement -- including moderate churches, the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship and similar larger bodies of moderate Baptists. One only has to spend a little bit of time around these groups to get a sense that our creativity and momentum is somehow being stymied.

Maybe it has to do with our collective inability to grieve our losses -- and a corresponding inability to dream bright dreams.

One block to moderate Baptists imaginatively venturing into the future may be a lack of good corporate grief work. In his book Care of Persons, Care of Worlds (Abingdon, 1992), pastoral theologian Larry Kent Graham writes, “Grief is a powerful discounter of creativity. As an instrument of death, rather than life, unexpressed grief sends our creativity underground and leaves us less than fully alive. When faced, it allows us to creatively reconnect with ourselves and the world of which we are a part.”

One need not know the gruesome details of the last 30 years of history to know that moderate Baptists -- or at least the ones who grew up in the Southern Baptist tradition -- have something to grieve. One need only eavesdrop on conversations between folks gathered in the hallways of churches or denominational meetings -- or to peruse the reader comments to almost any opinion piece on the Associated Baptist Press website -- to recognize that we are still actively grieving.

Graham suggests that working with grief “involves recognizing hidden attachments from the past and resolving these. Hidden attachments include the intentional identifications with ideas, persons, and patterns of relatedness that no longer allow for a creative response to one’s present situation and future opportunities.” Almost no one in the moderate Baptist family is without loss of some kind. Many lost jobs as professors and ministers in the wake of Southern Baptist turmoil. Many others have experienced the pain of churches splitting and long-time members leaving for other places of worship. Other churches share the collective memory of being expelled from Baptist associations or conventions. All of these events are painful and certainly call for the difficult work of grief.

And while anger is an important part of the process of grieving, it is not the intended result.

As anger is sometimes a mask for our deep sense of threat and fear, it can lead to a circling of the wagons in an effort to preserve institutions and save us any future heartache and pain. This mentality can keep us from making bold steps forward for fear of future criticism and division.

As moderate Baptist groups, therefore, we must find ways to satisfy our need to grieve appropriately. Churches may find it helpful to create liturgical acts that express their deep grief, using the language of lament, in order to move out of anger and eventually find new ways to reinvest emotional energy into our creative future together. We may forge services of worship during which we release those church members among us who have decided to depart from us instead of relegating this act to a poorly attended business meeting. Perhaps we could invent liturgies of remembrance and celebration of the past as we experience the severing of denominational ties and the forging of new alliances. What we must not do, however, is allow our grief to go unresolved and to fester.

Beyond our grief work, we must find new ways to connect our rich past to future possibilities of imagination and creativity. Rather than institutional preservation, we should focus on reformation and reinvention.

Graham suggests “dream work” as a path toward liberating our creative potential. He says dream work “involves releasing power to act upon the energy revealed in the dreams so that persons’ lives and social environments may be altered.”

While we will not all stretch out on the couch to explore our dreams with a psychoanalyst, we may find it helpful to engage in a bit of our own corporate dream work. One possibility for this work could be cross-generational gatherings of small groups of moderate Baptists engaging in brainstorming sessions about our future together.

It’s difficult to know what the future of moderate Baptists will be. But I’m certain that, whatever it is, we won’t get there if we don’t appropriately grieve our past -- so that out of our anger we may release our concern for preserving institutions and recreating a long-gone past and move forward, with curiosity and confidence, into a future of creativity and imagination.

-30-

Cody J. Sanders, a graduate of Mercer University’s McAfee School of Theology, is now a doctoral student in pastoral theology and counseling at Brite Divinity School at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth.

 

EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER: As part of our mission to provide credible and compelling information about matters of faith, Associated Baptist Press actively seeks a diversity of viewpoints in its columns, commentaries and other opinion-based content. Opinions expressed in these articles are not intended to represent ABP editorial policy and do not necessarily reflect the views of ABP's staff, board of directors or supporters.

 





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (24)Add Comment
CBF
written by AKScott, September 22, 2009
Perhaps the reason why groups like CBF are stymied in their creativity and momentum is found in their beginning. CBF was founded to oppose the new direction of the SBC. Anger over the conservative resurgence is part of their DNA. It is hard to imagine CBF moving past this anger, since it is such an integral part of their inception.

What CBF needs to do is indeed to dream a new dream. Focus on the positive goal of making an impact for the kingdom, rather than on the negative aspects of the past. CBF needs to become less anti-SBC and more pro-kingdom.

I suspect that this will not happen any time soon. Too many people have invested their lives in hating the SBC. Included in that group would be the people working for Associated Baptist Press. Moderate/Liberal Baptists were ousted from the convention for theological reasons. They became angry when they lost their power and control, so they started their own organization. CBF was birthed out of anger and frustration, so it is logical that it will remain an angry and frustrated body.
Good psychology, but that is not the main problem
written by Xenophon, September 22, 2009
I agree with Mr. Sanders psychological insights about "moderates" who lost power in the Southern Baptist Convention and, in some aspects, a way of life. But the main problem with so-called moderate Baptists is that they either reject orthodox understandings of Christianity or they tolerate within the church those who do. God will not bless any church or any purportedly Christian institution that denies the Word of God.

The Holy Spirit is who draws people to Christ, not us in our own efforts. Personal creativity and other human abilities are only effective spiritually in one's own life and in reaching others if and only if the Holy Spirit, who is not some metaphor for the goodness within us or some other New Ageish nonsense, is vibrant in the life of the individual Christian and the life of the church. To say that we evolved from apes or that Adam, Eve, Abraham, Issac, Jacob, et al were fictitious, that miracles are not real but only symbols, that there are historical errors in the Bible, Jesus did not rise from the dead physically, etc greives the Holy Spirit and so he withdraws from those who poison the minds of the young with these anti-theistic claims that attempt to combine the supernatural, miraculous nature of Christianity with naturualism. The contradictions are mounting up to heavily too ignore as well as why believe in something that one doubts is true? Anyone would be depressed if they filled their minds and hearts with that stuff (I am being polite here).

As soon as moderates come back to believing in the Bible and accept traditional interpretations of Christianity as being literally true and supernaturally real as God holds the world and us with it in existence every millisecond, then and only then will "moderates" recapture their vitality that has left them as the Holy Spirit departed in anguish over their unbelief.
...
written by KT2005, September 22, 2009
May I start by saying that as a man reading this article literally made me feel emasculated. One of the main problems with the CBF is they literally have a lack of men. Normal men do not think the way this author does.

Second, did you notice what was missing from the plan for CBF's recovery: GOD. No challenge to seek God or follow His lead. He literally advocates growth through soul introspection. The cause for change is self not God.

Listen again to his main quote:

"Grief is a powerful discounter of creativity. As an instrument of death, rather than life, unexpressed grief sends our creativity underground and leaves us less than fully alive. When faced, it allows us to creatively reconnect with ourselves and the world of which we are a part.”

"reconnect to ourselves"? I don't want to reconnect to my sinful self, I want to connect with Jesus. One would think a pastor would understand such things. With CBF schools like Mercer University’s McAfee School of Theology teaching this kind of self centered theology one cannot help but see that the CBF's future is going to be decline.
Moderate Baptists
written by mightyfowl, September 22, 2009
It would help a lot if someone would define what a "Moderate Baptist" is. As far as I can tell, from the ones I know or have had personal interaction with, during the CR, "moderate" isn't a word I understand, or would use to describe them.

Anybody out there have an objective definition?
question?
written by alms, September 22, 2009
When did CBF quit believing the Bible? I believe alot of Fundamentalists quit reading and believing the the Bible a long time ago.
Right On!
written by Ircel, September 22, 2009
Cody, you have articulated the situation very well. CBF does not have a theological problem or a "man" proble, but a lack of ability to deal constructively with the past and begin to dream again. We need a fresh, God-inspired direction that will reach out to the real world.
question for alms and Ircel
written by Xenophon, September 22, 2009
Let me ask you all, what distinguishes "fundamentalists" or Evangelicals from "moderates" in your understanding of these terms?
response
written by Dr. J, September 22, 2009
Cody:
I really respect the way you tried to tackle an obvious problem. I don't know if I agree with your solution, but at least you offered a solution. After reading the previous comments, it appears both sides of this issue must find a way to deal with the animosity so the Lord can use us.
For me, I have come to the realization the word "baptist" is better used as an adjective. By using it as an adjective, I feel connected to 400 years of ministry. it also helps me to deal with the issue of which your article refers. There are lots of great, southern baptist Christians. There are lots of great cooperative baptist Christians. In fact, I know many wonderful baptist Christians. Therefore,I am a baptist Christian.
As an aside, it was really good to read a reasonable article from a student at Mercer. I was worried that all students might think similar to Gushee.
...
written by jbird, September 22, 2009
Friend X, SBC folks affirms everything in your final two paragraphs--how is SBC's growth rate lately? It appears to me that there is a lot of 'scrambling' in Nashville for new models, new strutures, new strategies, new 'surges.' Can the SBC 'program' the Holy Spirit?
...
written by jbird, September 22, 2009
J, what is wrong with Dr. David Gushee ('Gushee' to you)? Cheap shot!David is one of the most sincere, Bible-searching, personally pious and upright Christian men I have ever met.
reply to jbird
written by Xenophon, September 22, 2009
Hi jbird! God uses people and their own talents and insights to accomplish his purposes. But if Christians depart from the guidelines God gave us to live by in the Bible as well as being open to being led by the Spirit, then there will be negative consequences that show up over time. The inverse is also true over time.
Be proactive and constructive
written by JDog, September 22, 2009
Thanks Cody for a wonderful and thoughtful piece on grieving and moving forward.

I want to encourage everyone to simply stop the generalizations: "Normal men do not think the way this author does," or "It was really good to read a reasonable article from a student at Mercer" (How many have you even read?). These are hurtful and very un-Christ-like statements.

Furthermore, this is an article on grief, not a theological treatise on the Holy Spirit or on God or on "Church" even, but about dealing with community and conflict. This requires soul introspection, where Christ finds himself at home with us, not a return to the "sinful self."

So, bravo to the article, and I think I just need to skip the comments for now on since several comments I've been reading on the ABP press for the past six months (from the same authors here and there) have absolutely missed the point of whatever article is under scrutiny.

Oh, yeah, and I'm a "real man" (My wife pinched me; I'm sure of it). And I'm a McAfee alumn. And I have written great articles, and continue to do so for my local newspaper. And am led by God's will and the Holy Spirit. And believe in orthodox Christianity and the literalism of the Bible. And the miracles. And soul salvation.

I don't believe in insensitive generalizations.
Why am I not surprised
written by JeffF, September 22, 2009
that this thread would deteriorate so rapidly to broadsides from each side of the argument. The issues at the heart of this have nothing to do with "believing the Bible." If we were to apply that logic then Islam and the Mormons are the most Bible-believing people in the world. There are times when faithfulness to the word will actuallycause decline- plenty examples in scripture of that. So growth cannot be considered a good measure of faithfulness. I do think Cody is partly right- all the grieving has already been done thats going to be done by moderates who left the SBC. Those still angry are the ones who will never forget and there are some of those but not many.The problem is not grief. The problem is indeed trying to cast a cooperative vision for the future. What will future denominations look like in a culture that doesn't care about denominations? Local churches are re-examining why they give money to state and national bodies in the first place, especially when the missional church movement is empowering local churches to the work of mission both at home and abroad. Churches (especially Mega-churches) that are stretched to the max with debt and declining offerings have to keep more $$ home which shrinks the pie even more. I'm all for talking and visioning, but at least when it comes to CBF, we've done lots of talking, lots of visioning. I just don't know who's supposed to be listening and discerning. I sense a huge group of folks saying "What's Next?" And nobody really knows the answer. Then we better keep praying.
Stymied institutions, and a beginning definition of "moderate"
written by comfortandjoy, September 22, 2009
"Stymied" may be an accurate description of present efforts to keep many institutions alive and moving forward these days. But then again, as a "moderate" Baptist, I've generally been more concerned about struggling to live according to God's call on my life than to keeping an institution alive. I don't know that the corporate litanies Sanders suggests would be my preferred way of working through the losses, as working through one's grief is a very individual process... certainly several hymns and scripture passages that remind me of Christ's strength, hope and reassurance have become very significant for me throughout my own grief processes -- both personal and denominational. Sanders' point is well-taken that one cannot dwell forever in anger, grief and loss without exacting a terrible toll on oneself and those surrounding him or her. In fairness, I would not want a casual or uninformed reader to think that all CBF-affiliated folks are bitter and angry... though many have certainly walked through that valley. I am eternally grateful for gaining great encouragement through many CBF-sponsored ministries and events over the past 20 years, but I certainly don't presume that this institution holds all the answers, either. Truly "only One is good" and each of us would do well to examine our motives and actions, asking (and offering) forgiveness where needed. I treasure my friends who are and have been affiliated with CBF, and continue to pray and hope for their future efforts.

"Mightyfowl" requested an objective definition of the term "moderate" Baptists. If you'll allow, I submit for your consideration -- with apologies to Jeff Foxworthy et al. -- a non-scholarly definition that begins like this:

You might be a moderate Baptist if...
1. You can't seem to feel a 100% sense of belonging in any earthly group of folks, but completely trust that God has provided all you need; 2. You can't with good conscience bring yourself to make blanket statements condemning other denominations, realizing what your own denomination is like; 3. You are more convinced of the spiritual importance of helping anyone and everyone along the journey to a living, transforming faith in Christ rather than determining what avenues of service they may or may not pursue to advance the Kingdom of Heaven; 4. You are not afraid of, but instead welcome questions about doctrinal and theological concerns that are presented in a respectful, honest (and perhaps even scientific) manner; 5. You realize that prayer and careful study of Scripture are both a tremendous privilege and a responsibility not to be squandered or mishandled; 6. You seek the leadership of the Holy Spirit to guide your prayer, study, and other efforts; and 7. You are thankful, despite many shortcomings, that God has allowed you to be influenced by a wide range of Baptists as well as other Christians as you seek to serve Him fully.

I imagine others might add more adequate descriptions to help characterize what is presently meant by the label "moderate." I really think we have much more in common than the divisions between various groups, not the least being the gift of grace offered by our Lord. May God help us to find ways to work together and respect one another, in spite of our differences.
...
written by javadave61, September 23, 2009
Part of the "grief" is that moderate Baptists have been slapped silly with the charge that they "don't believe the Bible." Moderate Baptists need to shake off that charge and turn it right back around on the fundamentalists. Moderate Baptists remind me of an abused woman who finally leaves a marriage, believes somewhere in her soul that she is a person of great value, but constantly hears the voice of the abuser in her head saying otherwise. For once, it's time for moderate Baptists to shake off that charge and say the truth about the whole inerrancy debate. It's not about the inerrancy of the Bible. It's about the inerrancy of opinions about the Bible. Someone said earlier that fundamentalists have stopped reading the Bible a long time ago. Absolutely. Fundamentalists practice a type of neo-liberalism, subjectively approaching the Bible with a preconceived idea (the way we treat women in ministry must be right; how could Revelation not be read dispensationally; how can Genesis 1 NOT be a scientific treatise) and... amazingly... the Bible "supports" their preconceived notion - PERFECTLY.

Do moderate Baptists have preconceptions? Absolutely. Do moderate Baptists have a perfect understanding of scripture? No. But I rarely meet a moderate Baptist who insists on the inerrancy of their opinions. I know numerous fundamentalists who hold inerrant opinions. Its time for moderates to take charge of the debate, call the subjective, bad interpretations of fundamentalism what they are. We no longer need to be the ones wondering if deep down there's something wrong with us because fundamentalists don't like us. No, they don't like us. Neither did the fundamentalists of Jesus day like it when he questioned their deeper motives.

Let's move past the grief. Moderate Baptists are in a much better position to connect with greater work of God in the world. Fundamentalists are still digging their hole and burying their heads in the sand to protect their inerrant opinions. The SBC is ensuring the death of the denomination by moving further and further away from having any voice in the culture. It's the moderate Baptist that has a footing in the ever shifting culture. Let's be proud of it.
...
written by gs12, September 23, 2009
Cody,
Thanks for an insightful and well-written article. You have a good understanding of the background of this family feud and the emotional impact it has had on those who were either compelled to agree or forcefully expelled from the SBC. Grief is accurate. While some are still working through their grief, most of us have moved on to follow God to new places on our Christian journey. Keep up the good work - and thanks for opening yourself to the chronic critics who comment here. Those who have not suffered this grief will never understand.
Missing out!
written by brotherinchrist, September 23, 2009
I am not a baptist, southern baptist, moderate baptist...but I am a follower and believer in Christ. This article caught my eye on Facebook. After reading it I found my heart breaking for those being discussed, i.e. "moderate" baptists, et al. As an objective observer, or at least an outside observer, it seems the focus of all sides of the SBC "situation" is on the denomination and not Christ. It harkens back to Romans where Paul admonishes jewish believers and gentile believers to get over themselves, per se, and focus on loving their brethren. (Romans 14-15) My guess is the so-called "moderate baptists" want to relax certain traditions of the SBC; whereas SBC does not. Why? If the answer is to assuage some level of embarrassment or sense of duty, then both are wrong. It is Christ alone who brings mercy and grace to all who will receive. Not being more tolerant or more legalistic! While the author seeks to bring the "moderate baptists" through grieving their loss of their denomination, I encourage those in agreement to instead consider the early church, mixed with jewish and gentile believers. I assure you that your differences are not nearly as great as theirs! And one more question: is grace for a moment or a lifetime? Don't be a stumbling block for your brethren..."moderates" or "liberals" or "conservatives". Get over the labels and get into Christ. He's the only answer.
Great Discussion
written by Slick, September 23, 2009
All too often the discussion about various interpretations of scripture and theological positions deteriorates into broad-brush smearing of those not in our camp. As a conservative Southern Baptist, I have for nearly 30 years been greatly offended by the Pharisees in the SBC who have made it a fight about their being right and everyone else being wrong. I have consistently held and said that such has done great harm to the cause of Christ.

When the non-Pharisaical got tired of the fighting and condemnation from the holier-than-thou crowd, they moved on. Unfortunately, as Sanders correctly states, the CBF has probably lost its way as it struggled with finding an identity that was clearly Baptist but more inclusive than the Pharisees in the SBC wanted.

The Pharisees of the SBC (note that not all in the SBC are radical Pharisees) strain at gnats, are more focused on being right, and take pride in condemning everyone else than in focusing on the Word of God in its totality and being open to the Spirit of God. They act as if God only speak to them through His Spirit. They may be well intended as I believe the New Testament Pharisees were but as we know from Scripture, those NT guys were misguided. I believe Jesus would be just as condemning of the behavior of our modern-day Pharisees in the SBC as he was of those He saw face to face.

Fortunately, we have many SBC congregations that just won’t be caught up in the politics of exclusion promoted and practiced by the SBC Pharisees. These churches attend to reaching the lost and the unchurched. These churches attend to discipling and growing all their members. These churches place a far greater emphasis on bringing their folk into a close walk with the Lord by promoting and encouraging Godly behavior by doing right more so than by condemnation of those that they believe behave wrongly. This is the real heart of the SBC. Maybe one day the radical extremists will grow silent and spend more time listening to the Holy Spirit that yelling at people who aren’t Pharisees.

Again, thanks to all who have contributed so positively to this discussion—even if we aren’t all in total agreement with each other! -
Rearranging the chairs on the Titanic...
written by GregF, September 23, 2009
RE “As moderate Baptist groups, therefore, we must find ways to satisfy our need to grieve appropriately… we may find it helpful to engage in a bit of our own corporate dream work…”

Mr. Sanders,

These are commendable sentiments, to be sure. Grief is a part of life and a well adjusted person should be able to work through the various stages of grief. It is also a good thing to plan for the future, or do “dream work” as it is called here.

The questions are:

1. Can one work through his grief and plan for the future in a place where “debate, controversy, and schism are not merely possible but inevitable”?

2. Can one move beyond anger and do the necessary dream work in “an ecclesiastical and theological framework that ensures controversy, dispute, and division”?

In Baptist Ways (Chapter 1) Bill Leonard points out that theological diversity, congregational autonomy, and freedom of conscience among Baptists ensure the above anxieties, and (to the best of my recollection) he offers no way out. This is a problem for all Baptists – not only Southern, or Conservative, or Cooperative – but, all Baptists.

If one is expecting to do grief-work and dream-work in that type of surroundings (and hope to realize a denomination better than what is currently available), then it is rather like rearranging the chairs on the Titanic.
and...?
written by Xenophon, September 23, 2009
What is your suggestion to avoid sinking like the Titanic, Greg?
...
written by Alan Sherouse, September 24, 2009
Cody:

Thanks for a sophisticated read. I must say, it's hard for our generation of Baptists to approach this issue with the level of sensitivity you provide here. We approach it. We talk about. We identify the tension, but rarely analyze it with such grace and detail. I, for one, find myself so quickly bristling at the conversations I hear in the hallways of those convention halls or quickly pointing out my distance from "daddy's war," and in doing so disregarding the reality of grief and loss out of which CBF and other organizations were formed. You've helped me see this from a pastoral perspective.

It's a productive perspective. A distinct perspective. And, as KT2005 notes above, it's an ab-normal perspective. Thank God! We Baptists have had our share of the conventional...and the androcentric, for that matter. No need for more of the same!

Peace.

Alan

Comments on remark from earlier this week
written by Xenophon, September 26, 2009
JeffF sez from a post above: "The issues at the heart of this have nothing to do with 'believing the Bible.'If we were to apply that logic then Islam and the Mormons are the most Bible-believing people in the world. There are times when faithfulness to the word will actually cause decline- plenty examples in scripture of that. So growth cannot be considered a good measure of faithfulness."

My response: There are a couple of claims here that could use more discussion. First, Mormons and Muslims do not believe the Bible as understood by orthodox Christians. Of course, the Bible can be misread and employed in support of just about anything as can any text. Consider how the left has hijacked the U.S. Constitution since 1937. Liberal and Neo-Orthodox Christians fall into the same problem as they attempt to harmonize the Bible with metaphysical naturalism.

But there is some truth to what Jeff is saying here, however he intended his remarks. The success of Mormons and Muslims in attracting adherents illustrate what economists who have studied religion have found, and that finding is that stricter religions which have a firm set of beliefs, over time, attract more devoted believers. The high requirements in conduct drive off the less committed so that those who remain form a nucleus of believers who are more energized to work for the common good of the group as each co-worker in their cause is more trusted and more willing to offer emotional and material support for their fellow believers. The group solidarity and peace of mind offsets the costs of feeling the odd-man out in the greater society or refraining from other pleasurable activities.

So, we can see how this process has taken place in the U.S. in recent decades with Mormons and other true believers such as Evangelicals. American Christian fundamentalists, and I mean real fundamentalists who stress separation, did not see similar increases in members possibly due to their placing unnecessarily strict requirements on their members without offering offsetting benefits. We can also better understand that those who are liberal or moderate in their orientation to religious belief and practice are less likely to attract and retain members over time. This is especially true in the U.S. with its lack of state support for religion and correspondingly greater reliance on members paying tithes, which acts to drive off less tenaciously committed members. Ironically, the push for more extreme church-state separation might have hastened the demise of mainline denominations with their more moderate tone.

For more on this line of analysis, see articles by economist Laurence Iannaccone.

http://www.religionomics.com/old/erel/S2-Archives/S22_Papers.htm
...
written by pjerwin, October 02, 2009
Cody Sanders wrote:
Maybe it has to do with our [moderates'] collective inability to grieve our losses -- and a corresponding inability to dream bright dreams.
Isn't that a textbook definition of "moderate?" Emotional extremes like grief and anger aren't part of the moderate's experiential lexicon. Moderate's are mild and calm and temperate. True moderates, as such, lack the passion needed to go one way or the other. They must stay within "reasonable" limits and not be excessive or extreme, which means they can't pursue excellence, because that's an extreme -- I guess you can sort of pursue moderate excellence. Moderates must be content with limited, average, and mediocre quality, medium or average quantity or extent.

Moderates must admit that they're not really moderate, but angry free (small "f") Baptists. Once they get honest with themselves about who they are, then they will be able to move forward. Until then, don't expect much.
future
written by Bobby McCord, December 02, 2009
Look at the episcopal denomination and you will see the future of MODERATE baptists. It doesn't matter if you have moderately strayed from truth or liberally strayed from truth. When we judge God's Word according to our culture instead of letting God's Word judge our culture, we have strayed. You cannot be moderately saved or moderately lost and I don't believe you can be a moderate Baptist. You are either a Bible believing Baptist or you are not!

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Copyright © 2007-2010 Associated Baptist Press, All Rights Reserved.