Time ranks SBC rejection of sex-offender database as 'under-reported' story
By Bob Allen   
Wednesday, December 17, 2008

NEW YORK (ABP) -- Time Magazine ranked the Southern Baptist Convention's refusal to establish a database of clergy sex offenders one of the most under-reported news stories in 2008.

A ranking of under-reported stories in Time's "Top 10 Everything of 2008" special feature placed the story at No. 6, behind a mix-up that accidentally sent U.S. nuclear-warhead fuses to Taiwan, the Congolese civil war, violence in Sri Lanka, and new guidelines for insurance coverage for mental health and regulation of food from animals that are genetically altered.

"Facing calls to curb child sex abuse within its churches, in June the Southern Baptist Convention -- the largest U.S. religious body after the Catholic Church -- urged local hiring committees to conduct federal background checks but rejected a proposal to create a central database of staff and clergy who have been either convicted of or indicted on charges of molesting minors," the magazine noted.

"The SBC decided against such a database in part because its principle of local autonomy means it cannot compel individual churches to report any information. And while the headlines regarding churches and pedophilia remain largely focused on Catholic parishes, the lack of hierarchical structure and systematized record-keeping in most Protestant churches makes it harder not only for church leaders to impose standards, but for interested parties to track allegations of abuse."

Christa Brown, Baptist outreach leader for the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, agreed the story was under-reported.

"It's such an extremely important story," she said. "The largest Protestant denomination in the land -- a denomination that claims 16.2 million members -- refused to even attempt to implement the sorts of proactive measures for routing out predators that other major faith groups have."

Brown, a survivor of clergy sex abuse, worked two years to draw attention to the problem of unreported sexual abuse in Southern Baptist churches before seeing denominational leaders recommend against her suggestion of a national database.

Last month Brown and SNAP National Director David Clohessy wrote SBC President Johnny Hunt asking for a meeting about establishing a system to report abusive clergy.

"As president of the Southern Baptist Convention, you now have the opportunity to show genuine leadership on the issue of clergy sex abuse and cover-ups," the letter said. "This may be one of the greatest leadership challenges in the history of Southern Baptists."

The SNAP leaders said Southern Baptists' local-church autonomy makes it all-the-more imperative that congregations have enough information to make responsible decisions about whom they call as ministers.

"The only way people in the pews will find out about clergy child molesters is if victims feel safe in reporting them," they said. "And victims are never going to feel safe if they have to report abuse by going to the church of the accused minister."

"Telling clergy victims to 'go to the church' is like telling them to go to the den of the wolf who savaged them," the letter said. "It is cruel to the victim and unproductive toward the end of protecting others."

-30-

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it  is senior writer for Associated Baptist Press.





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
What's this?
Comments (4)Add Comment
under-reported Story
written by SMP TURLISH, December 17, 2008
Would I recommend anyone going to their church to report sexual abuse, harassment or whatever before they report it to the proper civil authorities? Certainly not! Whether that was to the Southern Baptist Convention or the Roman Catholic Church.

Why would anyone do such a thing? The track records of both the Southern Baptist Convention and the Roman Catholic Church are terrible and do especially merit that kind of confidence.

The Baptists have learned little from the Catholics in the area of sexual abuse, sad to say.

Sister Maureen Paul Turlish
Victims' Advocate
New Castle, Delaware
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
SW Regional Director, SNAP
written by Joelle Casteix, December 17, 2008
Christa Brown is absolutely right - it's inexcusable that Baptist officials won't take the simple, cheap, and common sense step of alerting congregants about proven predators. And it's disappointing that many in the media have largely overlooked Baptist sex crimes and cover-ups.

Let's hope Baptist victims, like Catholic victims, start coming forward in ever-larger numbers and insisting that recalcitrant church figures take real prevention steps to protect kids.

Joelle Casteix
Newport Beach, CA
SW Regional Director, SNAP
Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests
nice thought
written by Dee Ann Miller, December 19, 2008
Joelle Castix of SNAP has a nice thought:

"Let's hope Baptist victims, like Catholic victims, start coming forward in ever-larger numbers and insisting that recalcitrant church figures take real prevention steps to protect kids."

The problem is that this is just not going to happen because there are no big pockets to go after--how convenient for the SBC!!! So the lawyers don't take many of the cases that don't get heard. Police often collude with churches and clergy, with Baptists, just as they have with Catholics. If lawyers are less likely to take cases, journalists don't usually listen. So cases get suppressed. Speaking as an advocate who has written and spoken persistently about collusion, especially in the SBC. This denomination of my heritage has a system that is incredibly hard to crack compared to any hierarchial system. I speak SBC a former missionary of the SBC who got an "education" the hard way, standing alone, and refusing to be silenced for what I knew years ago!

I predict that the leadership of the SBC will oddly find a way to consider itself as "misunderstood" rather than in need of open-heart surgery, though, as the Story continues to unfold for generations to come.
It is not about the Word of God, it is about money
written by PaulLeddy, April 04, 2009
The SBC is not concerned about justice for those abused, the SBC is concerned about protecting their resources and money.

Readers alone are responsible for the content of the comments they post here. The comments are subject to the site’s terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the ABP News. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
Write comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
busy